The Covid-19 vaccines have been at the centre of a heated debate since their introduction, with many questions and concerns raised about their safety and effectiveness.
Speculation has also been rife that the Covid-19 injections may contain traces of Graphene Oxide, a highly toxic and conductive substance.
Medicine regulators, with the support of the Mainstream Media, have repeatedly denied these claims.
But they were lying to you.
Because recent evidence has emerged that confirms the presence of Graphene Oxide, a highly toxic and conductive substance, in the Pfizer vaccine. And it has come from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which has been forced to publish the confidential Pfizer documents by order of the Federal Court in the USA.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored newsin your inbox…
Type your email…
The FDA had initially attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years, despite approving the injection after only 108 days of a safety review on December 11th, 2020.
However, a group of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA under FOIA to force the release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to the licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine.
In early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month, and since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website as they have been published.
One of the most recent documents published by the FDA saved as 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf, confirms the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.
The document is a description of a study carried out by Pfizer between April 7th 2020 and 19th August 2020, with the objective being “to express and characterize the vaccine antigen encoded by BNT162b2.”
In layman’s terms, the study was conducted to determine how the vaccine works. The study found that the vaccine used mRNA to instruct your cells to produce a protein (called P2 S), which is the Spike protein of the alleged Covd-19 virus.
The millions of spike proteins then bind to a receptor called ACE2 on the surface of your cells, inducing an immune system response.
But what is most interesting about the study is that it confirms on page 7 that reduced Graphene Oxide is required to manufacture the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine because it is needed as a base for the lipid nanoparticles.
Pfizer states on page 7 of the study in section 3.4 the following –
This is most peculiar because medicine regulators with the help of the Mainstream Media, have denied for months on end that Graphene Oxide is an ingredient of the Covid-19 vaccine. They’ve been able to say this because those who’ve proven and speculated Graphene Oxide is in the Pfizer Covid19 injection have been asking the wrong question.
What everyone should have been asking is, ‘is Graphene Oxide used in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid vaccine?’
Because as this document, which the FDA attempted to keep confidential and sealed the 75 years, shows, Graphene Oxide is indeed used in the manufacturing process of the vaccine because it is vital in helping to make the vaccine’s lipid nanoparticles stable.
Therefore, trace amounts or large amounts, depending on the batch, of reduced Graphene Oxide inevitably make their way into the Pfizer Covid-19 injections.
What are Lipid Nanoparticles?
The Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine uses tiny particles called lipid nanoparticles to deliver the vaccine’s genetic material (called messenger RNA, or mRNA) into cells in the body. These lipid nanoparticles are like tiny “bubbles” made up of fats and other molecules that can surround and protect the mRNA until it reaches its destination inside the cells.
The mRNA in the vaccine provides instructions to the cells to produce a protein (called spike protein) that is found on the surface of the Covid-19 virus. When the immune system detects this spike protein, it can recognize it as foreign and mount an immune response against it,
Furthermore, it has been discovered that two of the lipids in Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines are ALC-0159 and ALC-315, as confirmed by the assessment report of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine published by the European Medicines Agency.
Graphene Oxide is a tiny particle that is made up of carbon and oxygen atoms. It’s really small – so small that you can’t see it with your eyes. But even though it’s small, it can be dangerous.
It is known to be toxic to some cells, and research has shown that it can cause inflammation and damage to the lungs when inhaled.
In addition, Graphene Oxide is able to cross the blood-brain barrier, which is a protective barrier that prevents harmful substances from entering the brain. This could potentially lead to neurological problems.
Graphene Oxide is detected in the immune system as if it were a pathogen. Once injected it has an affinity for the central nervous system, potentially causing paralysis, strokes and alteration of the nervous system.
Furthermore, the long-term effects of Graphene Oxide exposure are not yet known. There is very little research on the long-term effects of Graphene Oxide exposure in humans, which means we don’t know what the potential risks are.
But thanks to the administration of the Pfizer COVID vaccine to millions of people, numerous times, we are finding out as the days pass. And sadly, both the short-term and long-term effects do not look good.
Further Evidence, Other Undeclared Substances & Deadly Consequences
Graphene Oxide is not the only toxic substance that the public should be concerned about. Because scientists have found Nanotech alongside Graphene Oxide when they have previously examined samples of Covid-19 injections.
Nanoscience and nanotechnology involve the ability to see and control individual atoms and molecules. Everything on Earth is made up of atoms—the food we eat, the clothes we wear, the buildings and houses we live in, and our own bodies.
But something as small as an atom is impossible to see with the naked eye. In fact, it’s impossible to see with the microscopes typically used in high school science classes. The microscopes needed to see things at the nanoscale were invented in the early 1980s.
Once scientists had the right tools, such as the scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) and the atomic force microscope (AFM), the age of nanotechnology was born.
And scientists from Spain, have declared that nanotechnology, which has the ability to control atoms in your body, has been found in all of the Covid-19 injections alongside Graphene Oxide. https://odysee.com/$/embed/@StopTheCrime:d/Breaking-News-SHOCKING—Here-is-What-Really-is-in-the-Vaccines:d?r=7w5QuSaWFRbu1bEVToV9pb1Zdn8mheAq
According to the Spanish scientists who examined the Covid-19 injections, Graphene Oxide has the potential to cause strange blood clots. This may explain why it has been proven that Covid-19 injections increase the risk of suffering thrombosis with thrombocytopenia.
But it is not just scientists from Spain making these claims. Numerous scientists around the world have published findings where they allege they have discovered both nanotechnology and Graphene Oxide in the Covid-19 injections.
After reviewing electron microscope images of elements contained in the Covid Pfizer and Moderna injections, Dr Daniel Nagase, a Canadian emergency room doctor, revealed that, strangely, the contents of the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines” show no signs of biological material, including mRNA or DNA. (Read more here).
Dr Nagase’s research group looked at Moderna and Pfizer samples under a regular microscope. Although there were a lot of very interesting images, they were unable to be conclusive about what exactly they were seeing. So, they used an electron microscope to determine what elements the “vaccines” contained.
Here are some of the images of what they found –
Found in a Moderna Covid “vaccine” sample
Dr Nagase examined a “ball with the legs growing out of it” found inside a Moderna sample and had this to say –
“This shape, this ball with the legs growing out of it, for some reason has aluminium in it. And I can say with certainty that this isn’t a mould spore or some other type of biological contamination, because the only thing in it is carbon, oxygen, and no signs of nitrogen, no signs of phosphorus, which would indicate something biological of origin. So, this thing that’s growing is non-biological.”
Dr Nagase and the researchers also discovered an unusual element from the lanthanide series – thulium – in a fibre-like structure found in a Pfizer sample –
Found in a Pfizer Covid “vaccine” sample
Dr. Nagase and the researchers found a variety of shapes and structures inside the “vaccine” samples they tested – crystals, chips, strands, bulbs, spheres, fibres and balls with legs growing out of them – “we have polymorphic, which is many different forms,” he said.
“They all seem to be made predominantly out of carbon and oxygen and they were in both the Moderna and Pfizer samples, and they seem to be in fibre forms. In the Moderna sample, the carbon-oxygen structures seem to be taking nanosphere forms and crystalline forms. And in the Pfizer sample … seem to only be forming fibres and crystals.
In a presentation to the Chilean radio station El Mirador del Gallo, Argentine doctor Martín Monteverde presented the analyses carried out by Corona2Inspect researchers on the microtechnology found in the Pfizer Covid-19 mRNA vaccine.
Argentina’s Dr Monteverde and other researchers carried out microscopic analyses of a vial of the Pfizer vaccine alongside four other Covid-19 “vaccine” types. He then sent these images to Corona2Inspect for further analysis. Corona2Inspect returned the images with their comments identifying what objects the images were showing.
You can watch a video of Dr Monteverde’s teams findings below – https://www.bitchute.com/embed/rp5ZyrmMLJQv/
Argentina’s Dr Patricia Aprea, Director of Evaluation and Control of the ANMAT, also accidentally admitted AstraZeneca’s Viral Vector Covid-19 injection also contains Graphene during a legal case regarding a death post-Covid injection.
You can read the document where ANMAT recognised that Covid-19 vaccines contain Graphene Oxide HERE in (Spanish) or below, translated into English using Google –
Dr Philippe van Welbergen, Medical Director of Biomedical Clinics, was one of the first to warn the public of the damage being caused to people’s blood by Covid injections by releasing images of blood samples under the microscope.
In a set of slides of blood samples taken from both “vaccinated” and unvaccinated people, Dr Philippe van Welbergen demonstrated that the Graphene Oxide, contained in the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines being injected into people by amateurs and volunteers with no adequate training, is organising and growing into larger fibres and structures, gaining magnetic properties or an electrical charge and the fibres are showing indications of more complex structures with striations.
At the beginning of July 2021, Dr Philippe, was interviewed and he explained that when his patients started complaining about chronic fatigue, dizziness, memory loss, and even sometimes paralysis and late onset of heavy menstruation (women in their 60s upwards), he took blood samples.
Their blood had unusual tube-like structures, some particles which lit up and many damaged cells.
Few healthy cells were visible. Until three months earlier, he had never seen these formations in blood.
We now know these tube-like structures are Graphene Oxide.
He also demonstrated that “shards” of Graphene Oxide are being transmitted from the Covid-19 vaccinated to vaccine-free or unvaccinated people, sadly destroying their red blood cells and causing blood clots. (Read more here).
Below is an image of typical healthy red blood cells as seen with a microscope, what blood should look like. There is no coagulation or foreign objects in it.
Sadly fibres of this size are capable of blocking capillaries.
You can also see that the Graphene fibres are hollow and have swallowed up some red blood cells.
In December 2021, a British medical practitioner offered to assist in an investigation to ascertain whether the results discovered by Dr. Andreas Noack, a German chemist, and Dr. Pablo Campra, of the University of Almeria in Spain, could be replicated in the UK and also to examine the Covid-19 injection vials for toxins or unexpected contents.
The medical practitioner seized an injection vial from the fridge housed in the surgery where she works and handed it to an independent investigator.
A UK laboratory analysed the sample using Raman Spectroscopy and found Graphene, SP3 carbon, iron oxide, carbon derivatives and glass shards.
The first sample that was evaluated was the Moderna 01 which was examined by Raman spectroscopy. The investigation clearly showed that all the inclusions within the vaccine have a strong carbon signal with confirmed graphene compositions of some representative forms.
Two clear signals were obtained from two objects. The flat ribbon-like inclusions exhibited clear Graphene spectra integrated with the spectrum of glycol and other minor compounds. The other clear signal was obtained from a calcite microcrystalline form and Carbon composite forms also had a clear Graphene signal.
You can read a copy of the document encompassing a case briefing, the UNIT report and a summary of the toxicity of Graphene nanoparticles on UK Citizen 2021’s website HERE.
The 48-page UNIT report, ‘Qualitative Evaluation of Inclusions in Moderna, AstraZeneca and Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines’, begins on page 12 of the document.
An Open Access review highlighting the toxicity of the graphene family nanoparticles can be viewed here.
Nanotechnology and Graphene have also been found in Pfizer’s Comirnaty “vaccines” by scientists in New Zealand. (Read more here).
At the end of January 2022, Sue Grey, co-leader of the Outdoors and Freedom Party, and Dr Matt Shelton from New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out With Science (“NZDSOS”) put the Health Select Committee on notice that serious contamination of the Pfizer vaccine has been uncovered and they needed to act immediately to stop the injection campaign.
Dr Shelton came forward to disclose the discovery of formations of nano-particles found by New Zealand scientists using specialised microscopic techniques.
None of the experts consulted had ever seen anything like this before, and none of these contaminants are listed as approved ingredients.
You can read the full account, with additional images and videos, HERE. But below is a snapshot of what one New Zealand scientist found.
The image below was taken from one drop of New Zealand’s Pfizer Cominarty “vaccine” under a cover slip, after it was inadvertently heated lightly, and viewed the same day through dark field microscopy at low magnification, projected onto a TV monitor.
The following images were taken after a new computer with improved graphics was purchased alongside new software for the camera –
They lied to you
Despite repeated assurances from authorities and mainstream media that the Covid-19 vaccines are safe and effective, evidence has emerged time and time again that proves they have not been telling the whole truth.
The use of Graphene Oxide in the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine has been a source of controversy and concern from the outset, with many individuals claiming that regulators and media outlets were deliberately misleading the public about its inclusion.
Despite initial denials, the documents released by the FDA, which they were forced to publish by order of the Federal Court in the USA. have confirmed the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer vaccine, raising questions about who we can trust.
This revelation should cause widespread alarm and will likely fuel suspicion about the true intentions of those in charge of public health.
When I discovered this study several years ago and wrote the following extensive piece on it, the study was a bolt from the blue, a complete devastating shocker.
It still is.
It is more than enough to topple the whole vaccine empire.
Honoring the work of the study co-author, Dr. Antonietta Gatti, Catherine Austin Fitts wrote, “Not long after the publication of this revolutionary study, tax authorities raided and investigated Dr. Gatti’s and [her husband] Dr. Montanari’s laboratory and private home—an all too usual method of intimidation.”
THAT was the “scientific follow-up.”
In a nutshell, Dr. Gatti’s 2017 study showed an incredible amount of contamination, in a whole host of traditional vaccines. The contamination was in the form of tiny nanoparticles, mostly metallic, and obviously highly harmful and dangerous.
Before reading my summary and analysis of that study—here is an updated communication from Dr. Gatti I received a few days ago. It describes, in a stark and disturbing fashion, what has been happening to her, her work, and her laboratory. This is chilling:
“At the end of last year, our laboratory no longer had the financial capacity to continue its research. The proceeds from the few analyzes requested by private individuals yielded enormously less than what the research cost us. Then, there were two possibilities: close everything or set up a foundation by giving away everything that belonged to us, hoping to find some sponsors. After all, all initiatives, even the most bizarre, find someone willing to contribute financially. Why not a foundation that does fundamental research on health? So, we opted for the latter choice, and the Nanodiagnostics Foundation was born.”
“But, after almost a year, not a cent has arrived. In short, no company, no private citizen, no institution is willing to contribute.”
“Many people continue to demand results and ask questions to which they have no answers from the institutions or their doctors, but, if it is a question of parting from some money, the silence is absolute.”
“It is clear that our work is a threat to billion-dollar businesses that are not exactly clear, at least for most people. For this reason, the most absurd and incredible slanders are invented to our detriment.
Not being able to dispute our scientific results, there are those who publish, usually anonymously, that we earn enormous sums of money, even giving the impression that the Foundation belongs to us, when it should be known that foundations do not belong to anyone, and no one can profit from them. And this is when we have donated everything that belonged to us, and we work for free.”
“Another tactic is trying to isolate and discredit us with lies. What the University of Bologna did a few days ago, the university where I graduated, then specialized and taught, is a small example.”
“A few months ago, that university asked us if we were willing to accept [a] student… who would prepare her graduation thesis with us. We agreed and agreed with the student on how to proceed. A few months passed, then, a couple of weeks ago, when the University authorities realized that the student would work with us, they sent us a message of a few lines in which they informed us that what we do (and which I had taught at that university) was of no interest to them (which, in a way, is true, although very far from the mission of the University). Needless to say, my letter to the Rector asking for explanations remained unanswered.”
“And it is also useless to say how difficult it is to publish the results that we continue to obtain, and which are not liked by those who financially maintain the medical journals, on whose scientific nature I prefer not to comment. For twice the Editor after the publication of an article (on vaccines and on SIDS) asked to retreat [sic] them. Only the work of the Robert Kennedy Jr lawyers stopped the request.”
“[Paper:] Novel chemical-physical autopsy investigation in sudden infant death and sudden intrauterine unexplained death syndromes” (click here)
“Just for your information, in spite of all difficulties, we are now dealing with very critical topics: spontaneously aborted babies, analysis of the brains of infants who died in cots (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, aka SIDS), analysis of what falls from the sky (e.g., recently hail never seen before), food, etc. All this can only be fought with personal discredit.”
“We haven’t had any visits from the regime for a long time. For them it is enough to monitor our computers and phones. The rest is done by ‘volunteers’. As for other scientists, no one deals with our topics in full. It must be realized that doing so represents a risk that is obviously preferable not to take.”
“As long as we can manage, we will continue to work. If, however, no sponsor materializes (idle chatter and empty promises are not only useless: they are a waste of time,) we will have no other option than to declare defeat, a defeat that belongs to the whole world and, above all, to the children who do not deserve the fate they are suffering.”
“…I give some details of our Foundation Nanodiagnostics (click here)…”
IF YOU CAN, PLEASE DONATE TO Dr. Gatti’s vital work at the above website.
Here is my original article on Dr. Gatti’s vaccine-contamination study:
Dangerous nano-particles contaminating many vaccines: groundbreaking study
“The Lung,” Second Edition: “Nanoparticles [are] comparable in size to subcellular structures…enabling their ready incorporation into biological systems.”
A 2017 study of 44 types of 15 traditional vaccines, manufactured by leading global companies, has uncovered a very troubling and previously unreported fact:
The vaccines are heavily contaminated with a variety of nanoparticles.
Many of the particles are metals.
We’re talking about traditional vaccines, such as HPV, flu, Swine Flu, Hepatitis B, MMR, DPT, tetanus, etc.
To begin to understand some of the destructive effects of contaminating nanoparticles in vaccines, here is the groundbreaking 2017 study:International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination Volume 4 Issue 1 January 23 2017 New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination Antonietta M Gatti and Stefano Montanari (Paper archived here and here)
“The analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case. This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines…”
Are the study authors leaving the door open to the possibility that the contamination is intentional?
“The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that toxicity…they induce an inflammatory reaction.”
“After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas…But they can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination…As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect…due to a nano-bio-interaction…can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way…It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA…”
“In some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues…”
“Given the contaminations we observed in all samples of human-use vaccines, adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and credible and have the character of randomness, since they depend on where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation. It is only obvious that similar quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more serious impact on very small organisms like those of children. Their presence in the muscles…could heavily impair the muscle functionality…”
“We come across particles with chemical compositions, similar to those found in the vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of environmental contamination caused by different pollution sources. In most circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they have no technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like the result of the random formation occurring, for example, when waste is burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular those meant for infants.”
This 2017 study opens up a whole new field: the investigation of nanoparticles in vaccines where none were expected.
Such particles are not medicine in any sense of the word.
Many legal and scientific “experts” assert the State has a right to mandate vaccines and force them on the population. But these contaminating nanoparticles are not vaccines or medicines. Only a lunatic would defend the right of the State to inject them.
Here is another section from the 2017 study. Trade names of vaccines, and compositions of the nanoparticle contaminants are indicated. Take a deep breath and buckle up:
“…further presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases [all 44 vaccines], whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product…”
“…single particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (less than 100nm) and aggregates…debris of Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium and Titanium; of Iron, Chromium, Silicon and Calcium particles…arranged in a cluster, and Aluminum-Copper debris…in an aggregate.”
“…the particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all the samples analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec, Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro).”
“…particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride).”
“…singular debris found in Repevax (Silicon, Gold, Silver) and Gardasil (Zirconium).”
“Some metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were also identified. Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and Aluminum (Vivotif, Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix, Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec); Gold or Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron, Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1) were also found. The only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in 25/44. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a nano-bio-interaction…occurs and a ‘protein corona’ is formed…The nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body.”
“…examples of these nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen (stable composite entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec… of stainless steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel…) and of Copper, Zinc and Lead in Cervarix…Similar aggregates, though in different situations (patients suffering from leukemia or cryoglobulinemia), have already been described in literature.”
I’m sure you’ve read official assurances that vaccine-manufacturing problems are “rare.” You can file those pronouncements along with other medical lies.
“I’d like the heavy metal sandwich on rye, please. And instead of serving it on a plate, can you inject it?”
Several vital questions demanding answers spring from the findings of this 2017 study:
Are some of these nanoparticles intentionally placed in vaccines?
Does the standard manufacturing process for traditional vaccines INEVITABLY lead to dangerous and destructive nano-contamination?
New nano-technology is already being employed to create several vaccines—supposedly “improving effectiveness.” In fact, the RNA COVID-19 vaccine are a nano-type. Does this manufacturing process carry with it the unavoidable effect of unleashing a hurricane of nanoparticle contaminants?
How many cases of childhood brain damage and autism can be laid at the door of nanoparticle contamination?
And finally, where are these contaminated vaccines manufactured? The above study did not attempt to discover this. It was outside the scope of the research. It’s common knowledge that, for example, in the case of the US, vaccines or their components, are, in many instances, not produced domestically. Where does this put control of safety? In, say, China, where there have been numerous pharmaceutical scandals connected to contamination of products?
The vaccine establishment does not show the slightest interest in answering any of these questions. They are busy pretending the questions don’t exist.
Ivermectin Cell & DNA Toxicity Study By Zhang Et Al
In a study called ‘Ivermectin Confers Its Cytotoxic Effects by Inducing AMPK/mTOR-mediated Autophagy and DNA2 Damage’ Zhang Et Al (full report here)
“Ivermectin has significant ability to induce DNA oxidative damage and enhance autophagy in HeLa cells”
“The accumulation of IVM in animal tissues and the excretion of urine and feces in the environment is the major source of potential toxicity… Human consumption of meat or milk contaminated with livestock can result in exposure to high levels of IVM exposure.”
“As expected, we found that IVM can induce oxidative double-stranded damage in HeLa cells, indicating that IVM has potential genotoxicity to human health. In addition, we observed the formation of LC3-B in HeLa cells, the accumulation of Beclin1, the degradation of p62 and the activation of the AMPK/mTOR signal transduction pathway.”
“We conclude that IVM produces genotoxicity and cytotoxicity by inducing DNA damage and AMPK/mTOR-mediated autophagy, thereby posing a potential risk to human health.”
“As shown in Fig. 1A, the cell clone formation rate decreased gradually with the increase of IVM concentration after 6 h of drug administration.”
Ivermectin Genotoxicity And Carcinogenicity Observed With Fruit Flies
In a study called ‘Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of ivermectin and amoxicillin in vivo systems’ by Aparecida de Sousa et al (full report here),
“The results revealed that IVM increased the frequency of epithelial tumor in D. melanogaster considering all evaluated concentrations”
“Findings showed an increase in the frequency of micronuclei in T. pallida treated with 11.42, 22.84 and 45.68 x 10 −5 mM of IVM. We conclude that chronic exposure to IVM is directly associated with events resulting from genetic instability (genotoxicity and carcinogenicity).”
Ivermectin appears to drastically reduce survival rate of fly progenies as the dose is increased:
Frequency Of Tumor Clones By IVM Treatment Dosage:
“It was observed a dose-dependence in the frequency of MN in T. pallida considering the highest concentrations (11.42, 22.84 and 45.68 × 10−5 mM) differing statistically (p ≤ 0.05) from the negative control, evidencing a genotoxic effect of IVM”
“The results observed in D. melanogaster and T. pallida showed that IVM can increase the damage in the genetic material, leading to genetic instability.”
Why fruit flies? The authors explain:
“In D. melanogaster, the test for the detection of epithelial tumor (ETT) represents one of the most promising alternatives to evaluate and identify possible carcinogens (Nepomuceno, 2015) … This test has also been used to verify carcinogenic events of different substances (Orsolin et al., 2012; Morais et al., 2018; Naves et al., 2018).”
Ivermectin Mutagenicity In Swiss Albino Mice
In a study titled ‘The mutagenic effects of ivermectin in germinal cells and serum protein of the mouse’ by Sweify et al
“Ivermectin… is extremely toxic to fish and aquatic life. Some animals showed reduction in the fertility, the number of variable fetuses and sperm count following treatment with (IVM).”
“Analysis of the treated samples revealed significant increase in meiotic aberrations, 33.83% vs 5.8% for the control (P < 0.001)… These findings supports the mutagenicity of IVM”
“Effects of ivermectin on spermatocyte chromosomes: … spermatocytes of the treated samples revealed significant increase in chromosome aberrations over the control values”
“The present observations pointed to the mutagenic effects of IVM. The frequency of translocation is significantly higher than that found in the control samples”
Ivermectin Vs Human Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y Study
In a study called ‘Ivermectin-Induced Apoptotic Cell Death in Human SH-SY5Y Cells Involves the Activation of Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Pathway and Akt/mTOR-Pathway-Mediated Autophagy’ by Zhange et al
“The results show that IVM treatment (2.5–15 μM) for 24 h could induce dose-dependent cell death in SH-SY5Y cells. Compared to the control, IVM treatment significantly promoted the production of ROS, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cell apoptosis. IVM treatment also promoted mitophagy and autophagy, which were charactered by the decreased expression of phosphorylation (p)-Akt and p-mTOR proteins, increased expression of LC3II, Beclin1, ATG5, PINK, and Pakin1 proteins and autophagosome formation… our results reveal that IVM could induce autophagy and apoptotic cell death in SH-SY5Y cells”
“IVM-induced cytotoxicity is dose- and time-dependent. At 6 h and 12 h, IVM treatment at 15 μM significantly decreased the cell viabilities to 44.3% and 35.6% (both p < 0.01), respectively; at 24 h, IVM treatment at 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, and 15 μM decreased the cell activities to 98.5%, 92.4%, 81.9% (p < 0.01), 70.2% (p < 0.01), 51.3% (p < 0.01 ), 37.6% (p < 0.01), and 23.8% (p < 0.01) (Figure 1), respectively. Correspondingly, marked cell morphology changes, including a spindle-like cell body, shrinkage, and dendrite fragmentation in high concentrations of IVM (at 7.5, 10, and 15 μM for 24 h, respectively) were also detected”
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/11/5/908
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/11/5/908
Ivermectin Vs Buffalo Peripheral Lymphocyte Cells
In a paper called ‘Antimutagenic Activity of Some Natural supplements on Ivermectin genotoxicity in Lymphocytes of Buffalo’ by El-makawy et al,
Cell Abnormalities
# Per 10,000 Cells Examined, Blue line = Control Levels
Structural Chromosomal Aberrations Observed:
“Ivermectin induced dose dependent significantly increase in the number of binucleated lymphocytes with micronuclei and also the frequencies of total chromosomal aberrations”
“In addition, the numbers of binucleated lymphocytes showed dose dependent decrease than control. These results revealed that the drug has a cytotoxic effect on the number of cell divisions. As the micronuclei are small chromatin-containing bodies arising from chromosome fragmentation by breaks or deletion, the results of MN formation confirmed our results of chromosomal aberrations indicating the clastogenic effects of ivermectin.”
In Vivo Ivermectin Vs Mice Bone Marrow Study
In a study called ‘The cytogenetic potential of ivermectin on bone marrow cells of mice in vivo’ from Sweify et al:
“IVM induced high level of chromosome aberrations in somatic cells, as it is ascertained by chromosome aberration assay and micronuclei production in bone marrow cells. This study revealed high clastogenic and genotoxic potential of IVM on mice”
Experiment 1: Single Injection Of Ivermectin
“The Table contains also the different types of chromosomal aberrations recorded in the examined cells. A single i.p. injection of ivermectin resulted in a significant (P≤0.001) increase in percentage of aberrant cells”
Here are the different chromosomal aberrations that were tracked after the invermectin injection. The transparent horizontal lines are the control levels:
Experiment 2: Two Injections Of Ivermectin
“It is clear from the Table (II) that injection with ivermectin induced high significant increase in the frequency of the damaged cells allover the examined periods (P≤0.001).”
Here are the different chromosomal aberrations that were tracked after the second invermectin injection. The transparent horizontal lines are the control levels:
Study of Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Effects Of Ivermectin In Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells In Vitro
In a study called ‘In vitro genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of ivermectin… on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO K1 ) cells’ by Molinari et all, they found that Ivermectin caused DNA-strand breaks in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO(KI)) cells. (Full article)
Here’s a chart of mitotic index (MI) and mitotic index factor (f) for each of the lesser doses before the “complete cellular death” seen in doses 50µm/ml. The transparent horizontal lines are the control group baseline
Decrease in mitotic index typically indicates genotoxicity. (Sweify, 2019)
“IVM exerted a cytotoxic effect of CHO cells within the 25.0–250.0 μg/ml concentration-range”
“Highest [IVM] concentrations (50.0–250.0 μg/ml) resulted in cellular cytotoxicity clearly revealed by delaying the cell-cycle progression, decreasing the mitotic activity, and inhibiting cell-growth. It is worth mentioning that both chemicals induced DNA-strand breaks revealed by the comet assay”
“A brief 80 min pulse-treatment of 5.0–50.0 μg/ml of IVM or 25.0 and 50.0 μg/ml of ivomec® , resulted in a manifest level of single DNA-strand break induction.”
O’Conner Ivermectin Rat Carcinogenicity Study
In an article called ‘Increased Pathology Incidence in the Forestomach of Rats Maintained on a Diet Containing Ivermectin and Given a Single Dose of N-Methyl-N1-Nitro-N-Nitrosoguanidine’ by O’Conner et al, they observed additional cancers in mice with a small amount (2 ppm) of ivermectin in their diet given a dose of a carcinogen called N-Methyl-N1-Nitro-N-Nitrosoguanidine. From the abstract:
“No tumors or pathological lesions were observed in the forestomach of the control animals or those given ivermectin alone. However, compared to animals receiving MNNG alone, rats maintained on a diet containing ivermectin (2 ppm) and given MNNG… showed an increased number of neoplasms (9/26 vs 3/18; p = 0.30) and a statistically significant fourfold increase in the number of pathological lesions (18/26 vs 3/18; p = 0.002), which include preneoplasia in the forestomach. In all cases, the pathological lesions were more severe in the animals receiving ivermectin and MNNG, compared to those receiving MNNG alone.”
Study of Genotoxic and Cytotoxic Effects Of Ivermectin In Mosquito Cells In Vivo
In a study called ‘Genotoxic and cytotoxic in vitro evaluation of ivermectin… on Aedes albopictus larvae (CCL-126™) cells’ (Full paper):
“IVM… induced DNA-strand breaks enhancing both slightly damaged and damaged cells at 25–50 μg/ml IVM”
“Cytotoxicity was observed at concentrations higher than 25 μg/ml IVM… [Ivermectin] exerted a delay in CCP and a reduction in PRI when 25.0 μg/ml was employed whereas cytotoxicity was observed at higher concentration than 50.0 μg/ml.”
“A marked reduction of about 98% … of MI [mitotic index] compared to controls was noted with 25 μg/ml of IVM”
“NR and MTT assays revealed that [IVM] induced a cell growth inhibition within the 1–250 μg/ml concentration range”
“Data indicated that IVM exerts both genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in insect cells [A. albopictus larvae CCL-126 cells] in vitro”
This chart shows the percentage of undamaged, slightly damaged & damaged cells with the addition of Ivermectin (measured in μg/ml). The transparent horizontal lines are the control levels.
Decrease in mitotic index typically indicates genotoxicity. (Sweify, 2019)
Why insect cells? The authors’ address this:
“It was demonstrated that among insects, mosquito cells cultures provide a useful in vitro system for studying deleterious effects induced by xenobiotics (Mukherjee et al. 1986; Bolza ́n et al. 1998, 2000). Investigations demonstrated that DNA damage induced by different chemicals was found to be less extensive and repaired more efficiently in Aedes albopictus larvae cell lines compared to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells”
Ivermectin In Cebu Brahman Cows
In a paper called ‘Comet assay to determine genetic damage by the use of ivermectin in zebu cows’
“The values of classification of comets indicate cells with high levels of damage (grade 3: cells with high damage). The rate of DNA damage of the treatment to 1% to 3.15% was significant… The results obtained in this study demonstrate the likely genotoxic potential of the use of IVM in cattle.”
“Regardless of the IVM concentration, the presence of nuclei with DNA migration (Figure 1a and b) was observed at a percentage greater than 75% in all cells observed per plaque, demonstrating the ability of the IVM compound to produce simple chain breaks in the DNA molecule.”
The Comet classification describes how. All of the control group (no treatment) measure 0 on the comet scale. Here are the Results for the IVM treated cows:
Grade 3 = cells with high damage
“The results found in the present study constitute concrete evidence for the induction of genomic damage as exerted by IVM, using the comet assay methodology”
“Ivermectin (20 pg/mL) decreased glucose utilization in IB-RS-2 cells in 11, 30, and 31%, respectively, after 24,48 and 72 h”
Ivermectin Vs Tadpole DNA
In a study called ‘Genotoxicity of Three Avermectins on Polypedates megacephalus Tadpoles Using the Comet Assay’ by Geng et al, some very concerning findings were noted in relation to Ivermectin’s “genotoxic effects at relatively low concentrations” in Tadpoles.
The first chart shows a dose-dependent decline in cell viability as IVM dosing increases:
“Our results showed clearly that avermectins caused dose dependent DNA damage on amphibian tadpoles… The three avermectins increased the DNA damage observed in the tadpoles in a dose-responsive manner. There were strong linear correlations between the DNA damages and the concentrations of the three test substances (Figure 2). The cellular distributions of DNA damages in tadpoles are shown in Figure 3. Of the tadpoles treated with increasing concentrations of the three test substances, higher proportions of cells had greater amount of DNA damage than those of the negative control”
This chart shows a dose-dependent increase in DNA damage as IVM dosing increases:
“According to these results above and our finding that avermectins can cause DNA damage in tadpoles at the concentrations below the recommended applied levels (Xu et al., 2010), we consider it possible that avermectins are carcinogenic, and confirm it has the negative impact on the development of tadpoles”
Ivermectin And Pig Kidney Cells
In a study entitled ‘Toxicity Assessment of the Antiparasitic Ivermectin’ by Rodrigues et al, the researchers exposed pig kidney cells to ivermectin at different levels and measured the rates of cell death (Full article)
“Our data show that ivermectin inhibited cell growth (Fig. 1). This effect was time and dose dependent, and ranged from 38 to 84% after 72 h in cells treated with 2-20 pg/mL; at the dosage of 40 pg/mL, cell death occurred within 24 h.”
“Ivermectin (20 pg/mL) decreased protein synthesis and glucose utilization.”
“Protein synthesis is inhibited in a continuous way in the cells exposed to ivermectin (20 pg/mL). When compared to the control cultures, the protein of treated cells is 13,24, and 28% less, respectively, after 24, 48, and 72 h.”
In case you are unable to read them on above links, download from below, both books in PDF. Plus more books on poisonous needles aka vaccines… Uh spare me Fuck them vaccines!
While it may seem that the book on contagion, viruses, bacteria, and germs has long since been closed and considered scientific fact, this couldn’t be further from the truth.
Since microorganisms are pleomorphic (they change shape) based on the pH and toxicity of the terrain, how can they be categorized and said to cause a specific disease? And then how can you make a “shot” for them? How can something even have “immunity” to them when they are your own cells and always changing to assist the body to heal and release toxins?
How can you know when you take these living cells from the living blood, said organism is not changed by the removal methods? What about when you change the terrain inside a petri dish and drug the cells? How is it good science to merely assume these cytopathic methods are not interfering with the results? Why can’t we just take the exudate from a patient and inoculate it into a healthy person and get the same disease or isolate a virus from mucus to make a vaccine?
What about when families or groups get sick together? Families often get poisoned by the same sources (have common toxic exposures), especially by toxic food, sick-building syndrome, and body care products. Also, families share stress together, because you cannot easily avoid energetic influences when sharing life so intimately.
What about pheromone triggers? As an aside, this is what I noticed was at least one cause of the more so current sudden loss of taste and smell they were blaming on fake covid when it happened to me after hugging a freshly jabbed customer. Just as with women, whose menstrual cycles line up when sharing the same space, or the Bruce Effect reducing the fertility of those living in apartment buildings above the 5th floor, so too does the body have its pheromonal triggers for its cleansing schedules or triggers of cleansing. If 3 of 5 people in a household have accumulated toxins, they will all get ‘sick’ together and cleanse. This is efficient with regard to survival. The 2 who don’t “catch the invisible virus” had no need to cleanse. How many kids and families fall ill after Halloween, Birthdays, and Christmas after eating loads of pro-inflammatory sugar and other junk?
What about those random occasions when grandparents visit sick grandkids and then get sick too? Often, when a family gets together, they poison themselves. In our culture, it is common to eat “fun meals” as a family when visiting. The grandparents come and everyone eats refined white sugar, glyphosate-laden foods, rancid seed oil fried chips, sugary chocolate, or greasy fast food, and drinks alcohol, pop, coffee, etc. Then they’re sick afterward and decide they must have caught a virus, just like the kids. This does not always happen however, many times people will visit, and someone is sick or the grandchildren are sick, and no one else gets sick too.
Here’s the rub, no one ‘catches’ anything. What is happening is called a lack of self-responsibility and the germ is being used as the scapegoat.
How about EM field interference, detox triggers, seasonal triggers, familial sympathetic resonance, empathic resonance, the morphogenic field, and the placebo and nocebo effects? What about the many studies that disprove mucus as a carrier of contagion, the insanity of trying to trigger detox mechanisms in animals during “infection studies” which has nothing to do with a contagious microbe but instead a poisoning of the terrain to trigger the body into a mechanistic action of waste removal? In fact, Louis Pasteur pulled this magic trick when he was make-believing rabies back in the day. You can read all about the liar and fraud Pasteur here.
It is the craziest thing to me, the thousands of indoctrinated “scientists” inventing the never-needed and the always-harmful vaccines that merely poison the body in a specific manner to attempt to trigger a matched detox pattern from it, and then they turn around and say this is the cure! What an alarming embarrassment for all of mankind (it’s actually cringe-worthy). No wonder they would rather keep living the lie than support the unstoppable scientific paradigm shift happening right now. Don’t even get me started about the false theory of antibodies – you can learn more about this topic from my friend Dawn Lester, co-author of the book What Really Makes You Ill.
Dr. Urlic Williams – “The modern medical system, to the extent of perhaps 80%, is nothing but a gigantic, cruel, ludicrous, lucrative, transparent fraud. Doctors do not know what disease is, nor how it is brought about.”
Do you know that little old wives tale that still runs amok out of the mouths of the falsely educated about smallpox-infected blankets killing the Indigenous? Cool story bruh, but not what happened. From my friend Tracey Northern’s blog:
Jim West pointed out to me on another article this little nugget- “Alternative view: Smallpox is likely arsenic poisoning (symptoms are same) and the vax/Indian stories are a coverup. Smallpox was everywhere that European trappers or solders ventured. They all carried arsenic trioxide for tanning or perhaps hidden upstream warfare.”
Here are just a mere few study examples unable to prove contagion:
In March of 1919, Rosenau & Keegan conducted 9 separate experiments in a group of 49 healthy men, to prove contagion. In all 9 experiments, 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/221687
In 1921, Williams et al. tried to experimentally infect 45 healthy men with the common cold and influenza, by exposing them to mucous secretions from sick people. 0/45 became ill. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/
Dr Amandha Vollmer – “Most of what they’ve described are made up from artifacts created by their removal from the body. We contain a liquid crystalline structure that sends out signals as fast as the speed of light or faster. They try to keep this knowledge from us by pulling everything apart and inventing stories about how it operates, selling us a materialistic answer to a frequency question. We have liquid crystals inside of us called EZ water that our mitochondria manufacture based on biophotonic (light) energy. We have antennae due to this nature which communicate with our world. Once we understand this, their rudimentary explanations are laughable.”
Let’s take chickenpox as an example. This is called a childhood exanthem (a growth trigger of childhood. More such exanthems are measles, mumps, rubella, roseola infantum, 5ths disease, etc.) If it is so contagious, why is it that not all will get it who are exposed? The liars will tell you that you must be “immune” somehow, another term manufactured by the germ theory cultists in order to stop the questioning and explain away why only some will fall ill.
Some in the tribe will respond to sympathetic resonance because they were already primed to remove the acidic protein wastes through their skin (from poor feeding, from self, or even though the mother when in utero). I am sure science has caught up with the fact that we produce frequencies and energy fields, yes? Not every child needs to experience this expression either. The acidic waste is of such a low pH, it literally burns the skin, creating a water blister.
It is a one or two-time clear out as a growth process that has a trigger, sometimes it is suppressed in those deeply poisoned, like from those vaccinated and the trigger mechanism goes off way later (this happened to me when I was 17 as the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine did great damage to my natural processes) and I had a very large expression. This vaccine also damaged my body’s own HEPA filter for the lymphatic system called tonsils which led to their ultimate removal, after 12 rounds of amoxicillin (I will have another article on that topic coming up).
Most people believe they will get sick if someone else is sick, oftentimes simply because of belief (nocebo effect). Be your own scientist. If you stop believing in contagion and then test yourself by hanging around someone ill, will you still “get it”? I have tested this myself. Once my beliefs changed, I stopped “catching” things. Fear is a powerful emotion that can warp our perceptions. Why do you think our enemy controlling the corporate governments of the world uses it so much?
Now, if you are locked into a room with no airflow with many sick people who are expressing their toxic gases (a problem of basic hygiene), and you also are weakened by lack of proper nutrition, a clogged liver, and a damaged energy field, over time you could fall into resonance with their cleansing method, which could trigger a similar expression in yourself (just as the famous nurse Florence Nightengale noticed and described with the progressive fever in sick soldiers – she solved the problem by opening up the windows). However, you did not CATCH it from a random bug floating through the air. That is a complete myth based on superstition, not science. You earned the illness by gaining toxic credits into your body, which has important processes at the ready to remove the unwanted wastes.
Dr. Herbert Shelton – “The best way to eliminate people’s fear of contagion is to teach them about the real cause of illness.”
The germ theory is completely false and we need to ascend our thinking away from fear, myth, illusion & scientism, which is the religion of science and not actual science. The actual science proves no contagion and no germ causing any disease: pleomorphic germ action is the result of a diseased body and is there to serve the body to remove dead, dying, or damaged tissue, repair genetic material, and push the wastes out.
I can almost hear the mental noise from many after reading this as the propaganda implanted mind-worm starts to wriggle asking BUT WHAT ABOUT POLIO? Ah, that old chestnut. I have addressed the myth of polio HERE.
Here are a few more studies for you:
A study showing that HIV is not sexually transmitted:
NS Padian et al, “Heterosexual Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) in Northern California: Results From a Ten-Year Study,” Am J Epidemiol 146, no. 4 (August 15, 1997): 350-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009276.
A study that could not prove Koch’s Postulates of Disease Transmission: Even using unpurified mucus from lung-cancer-grown cells, they couldn’t prove contagion. Only a few got sick from all that disgusting material being shoved down their throats.
JFW Chan et al, “Simulation of the Clinical and Pathological Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Golden Syrian Hamster Model: Implications for Disease Pathogenesis and Transmissibility,” Clin Infect Dis. (March 26, 2020), ciaa325. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa325.
A study showing that hand washing and hygiene practices do not change illness “transmission”:
J Xiao et al, “Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures,” Emerging Infectious Diseases 26, no. 5 (May 2020).
BOOKS: –Virus Mania by Torsten Englebrecht, Dr. Claus Köhnlein, Dr. Sam Bailey –The Contagion Myth by Dr. Tom Cowan and Sally Fallon-Morell –Breaking the Spell by Dr. Tom Cowan –What Really Makes You Ill? By Dawn Lester and David Parker –The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenberg –Goodbye Germ Theory by Dr William P Trebing –Bechamp… Continue reading Resources on Terrain from Dr. Amandha Vollmer of Yummy.doctor
[Go herefor FOIs on other imaginary “viruses”, here for FOIs on “virus” control experiments and here for FOIs on whether bacteria have been shown to CAUSE disease.]
Would a sane person mix a patient sample (containing various sources of genetic material and never proven to contain any alleged “virus”) with transfected monkey kidney cells, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs, then claim that the resulting concoction is “SARS-COV-2 isolate” and ship it off internationally for use in critical research (including vaccine and test development)?
Because that’s the sort of fraudulent monkey business that’s being passed off as “virus isolation” by research teams around the world.
Just 1 of many examples is shown below – this is from a study cited by the Australian Department of Health as a paper “which led to the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in culture“. (Can you spot the oxymoron in that quote?)
If you’re new to the topic of “virus isolation/purification”, I strongly recommend that you begin by reading the Settling the Virus Debate Statement: https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/ and/or watch this 5 minute video from Dr. Cowan. Or go here for many more resources, and corroborating evidence.
My colleague Michael S. in New Zealand and I (CM) and many other people around the world have been filing Freedom of Information “requests” to institutions in various countries seeking records that describe the isolation/purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” from any unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient.
The reason: without the crucial step of isolation/purification having been performed (from many patients, followed by characterization, sequencing and controlled experiments), there is no way to claim scientifically that the alleged “novel coronavirus” (blamed for widespread death/disease/lockdown measures) actually exists.
Without this step having been performed and followed by characterization, sequencing and controlled experiments, all claims of this alleged “virus” are nothing but wild speculation backed only by fraudulent science, fraudulent tests and fraud-based diagnoses. (I have done numerous interviews on this topic, which you can find near the bottom of this page.)
The “requests” filed by my colleague in NZ and I (and many of the other submitters) have not been limited to records of isolation performed by the respective institution, or limited to records authored by the respective institution, rather they were open to any records describing “COVID-19 virus” (aka “SARS-COV-2”) isolation/purification performed by anyone, ever, anywhere on the planet.
Every institution has failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing the isolation aka purification of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” directly from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka “Vero” cells and fetal bovine serum).
(And, to our knowledge, no one on the planet has ever purified the alleged “virus” even from a cell culture!)
In their responses, numerous institutions have made it explicitly clear that isolation/purification is simply never done in virology, and that “isolation” in virology means the exact opposite of what it means in everyday English. This is also evidenced in every “virus isolation” paper we have ever seen, for any alleged “virus”.
(Note: Sébastien Grammond, a man who acts as “Federal Court judge” here in Canada, has concocted a bogus “confirmation” that “SARS-CoV-2 virus is real” – based on zero valid science and despite knowing of that all 138 institutions listed in my affidavit had failed to cite even 1 example of the alleged virus having been purified from any patient sample on the planet. Why waste time on science or logic when you can simply “accept” the “Attorney General of Canada’s invitation to take judicial notice that the virus is real”? Sounds perfectly legit. “Noticing” widespread beliefs is so much better than reviewing the pertinent facts.)
PLEASE SHARE THESE DOCUMENTS FAR AND WIDE
As of September 16, 2023: 218 institutions and offices in 40 countries have responded thus far, as well as some “SARS-COV-2 isolation” study authors, and none have provided or cited any record describing actual “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification. All of the responses in our collection are available from this page.
Google drive folder where all of the FOI documents as of July 14, 2022 are grouped by country (for the most part) and compiled into 11 pdfs (Exhibits 1 – 4; Exhibit 4 has 8 parts): https://tinyurl.com/IsolationFOIs
If you would like to receive email updates with new FOI responses, let me know at christinem@fluoridefreepeel.ca or cmssyc@gmail.com.
https://www.bitchute.com/embed/sC6QUy8jVU3T/
The list shown below was current as of October 5, 2021; it’s much longer now.
(Yes, we are aware of the many publications wherein authors claim to have “isolated the virus”. We’ve looked at numerous such studies and have yet to see one where they actually did so. Claiming to have done something and actually doing it are sometimes 2 different things, even in peer-reviewed science.
And yes we are aware of the many published alleged “SARS-COV-2 genomes” – these were in fact manufactured, not discovered.
And yes we are aware that EM photos have been published, allegedly of “the virus”, however a photo of something does not tell you what the thing is, where it came from or what it does. One has to scrutinize the Methods used to “isolate the virus” / obtain said photos / obtain alleged genomes, and that is when absolutely everything falls apart with “COVID-19” (and virology in general).
Anyone is welcome to post these documents on other sites. Please do! We only ask that you also cite this particular webpage because this is where we add of all the new FOIs that we obtain. It’s important that people know where they can find the most up-to-date and complete collection.
And if you obtain or come across new responses that are not in our collection, please forward them so that we can add them to the collection!
FOI responses from institutions in the U.S., India, Republic of South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, U.K., England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Spain, European CDC, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Ukraine, Colombia, Uruguay, Italy, Portugal, Brazil, Republic of Colombia, Argentina, Ilse of Man, Phillipines, etc., plus emails from Germany’s Robert Koch Institut (RKI) and several “virus isolation authors”.
A big Thank You to all the individuals who have now kindly shared additional responses that they obtained re isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2”. Some prefer to remain anonymous, others are named below.
Ok, here we go. Below are SARS-COV-2 FOI responses from >150 institutions outside of Canada.
The World Health Organization failed to respond to my FOI-type query sent on February 22, 2022 seeking any records that describe any alleged “SARS-COV-2” being found in the bodily fluid/tissue of anyone on Earth and purified, by anyone, anywhere, ever… in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments (aka “science”): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/W.H.O.-request-SARS-COV-2_-purification.pdf
November 28, 2022: A colleague in Japan required of the people at World Health Organization to provide/cite any record of the imaginary SARS-COV-2 being found in and purified from any sick person on the planet, in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments aka science. But instead, they directed her to a useless webpage about a global database of public “health” and “social” measures applied during the imaginary pandemic: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/WHO-Nov-2022-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
On March 1, 2021 once again the CDC made clear to my colleague in NZ that they still have no records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation performed by anyone, anywhere on the planet, ever… just not in so many words. Instead, the CDC absurdly implied that isolation of “SARS-COV-2” would require the replication of a “virus” without host cells and thus is impossible. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CDC-March-1-2021-SARS-COV-2-Isolation-Response-Redacted.pdf
September 8, 2021: AnotherFOIA response from the CDC re purification of the phantom “SARS-COV-2”. This time, CDC cited a paper wherein the authors never even claimed to have purified any “virus” themselves, and instead falsely stated that: “SARS-CoV-2 was isolated in Vero cells … (8)” [oxymoron]. [CDC’s reference #8 is the infamous Harcourt et al. study.] https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Sept-8-2021-CDC-package.pdf
April 1, 2022: The U.S. National Institutes of Health failed to provide or cite even 1 record of the alleged “SARS-COV-2” (or any alleged “variant”) having been purified from the bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of any patient on the planet, by anyone, anywhere, when responding to a request for records in the custody of the CDC, and they bizarrely and inaccurately stated that the request was “improper”. Full letter: Pdf: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/CDC-2022-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
October 20/21, 2022: The people at CDC were challenged to provide/cite scientific proof of the existence of the alleged SARS-COV-2 or the alleged HIV based on controlled experiments using purified particles. They could not, since none exists, so instead they provided useless links for HIV, not even purporting to show controlled experiments. For SARS-COV-2 they gave the same paragraphs that they’ve been giving people for the last year or so, with links to more useless studies and webpages. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CDC-SARS-COV-2-HIV-scientific-proof-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
December 16, 2022: The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was unable to provide any record of the alleged SARS-COV-2 spike protein being found in anyone and purified (as opposed to “recombinant” “spike protein” being created in a lab and then studied, as though that reflects something going on in actual people); and so they responded as though this was another FOI regarding the fake virus, and provided the same useless paragraphs that they’ve been giving people for the past year or so: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/CDC-no-purified-spike-protein-PACKAGE-to-Dec-16-redacted.pdf
February 14, 2023: Once again, the people at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were unable to provide any record of the alleged SARS-COV-2 spike protein being found in anyone and purified. (I specifically ruled out studies where “recombinant” “spike protein” was created in a lab in order to be studied, because those studies can’t provide any evidence of the alleged “SARS-COV-2 spike protein” actually existing in people, i.e. people with the fraudulent convid diagnosis, or people who received the fake mRNA vaccines, or anyone at all.): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/CDC-spike-protein-PACKAGE-redacted-2023-02-14.pdf
March 21, 2023: Roger Andoh acting as FOIA Officer in the Office of the Chief Operating Officer, CDC confessed that the CDC doesn’t even have a study where authors did either of the following:
1) tested for the alleged “SARS-COV-2 spike protein” in the blood of “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated” people, and compared the results – to look for evidence that the “mRNA” quackcines cause bodies to create the protein
March 2, 2023: U.S. Centers for Disease Control can’t prove the existence of “SARS-COV-2 spike protein“
Roger Andoh, acting as FOIA Officer in the Office of the Chief Operating Officer, CDC and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, confessed that these institutions have zero proof of the existence of the alleged “SARS-COV-2 spike protein”, this time to my colleague Louis Stephen.
Also, in this response, Roger evaded: – a request for proof of claims regarding so-called “SARS-COV-2” antibodies, – a request for documentation explaining why it’s necessary to use synthetic rather than natural (alleged) mRNA in convid jabs, – a request for documentation explaining why it’s necessary to use monkey kidney cells to (allegedly but not really) grow a “virus” that supposedly infects human lungs, etc.: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/CDC-spike-antibodies-why-Vero-etc-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 13, 2022: Some anonymous man or woman in the Public Records Office at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill provided unhelpful documents that do not contain scientific evidence of the alleged SARS-COV-2, and confessed that there are no other documents relevant to the request: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/UNC-Chapel-Hill-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
December 10, 2021: U.S. Department of Labor / Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) admitted they have no record describing purification of any “COVID-19 virus” (aka “SARS-COV-2”, including any alleged “variants”) from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, ever: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/OSHA-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 3, 2021: Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) / National Institutes of Health, in response to a request for records that demonstrate that NIAID or NIH has a physical sample of purified “SARS-CoV-2”: – conflates isolation/purification with growth of the imaginary virus in cell culture, – provides irrelevant, distracting comments re Koch’s Postulates, – cites useless, irrelevant studies and webpages, and fabricated computer “genomes”, and -confirms that virology isn’t a science. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/NIAID-NIH-Sept-3-2021.pdf
March 11, 2022: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services confirms that Vivek Murthy, the man who acts as “Surgeon General”, has no record describing anyone on Earth finding and purifying the alleged “SARS-COV-2” (the alleged “COVID-19 virus”), or any alleged variant thereof, from the bodily fluids of any diseased human. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/HHS-Surgeon-General-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
August 19, 2021: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services cited useless, irrelevant studies and webpages, and fabricated computer “genomes” in response to an FOIA request for “Records that demonstrates the US Department of Health and Human Services has a physical sample of the isolated and purified SARS-CoV-2 virus…” https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/US-Health-and-Human-Services-response-redacted.pdf
June 24, 2021 FOIA response: Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) failed to provide/cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from a patient sample by anyone, anywhere. NIAID referred me to the anti-science CDC study by Harcourt et al., even after I’d advised them of CDC’s June 7, 2021 ‘no records’ response. I have appealed to NIAID’s FOIA Public Liaison. The communications between myself and NIAID are provided here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/NIAID-FOIA-package-redacted.pdf
The CDC study cited by NIAID did not purify anything from a patient sample. It is the same study that Dr. Thomas Cowan wrote about in 2020 (“Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’“) where he also addressed the fraudulent nature of the authors’ fabricated “SARS-COV-2 genome” (as shown in the screenshot below).
Previously, in 2020, Ron Bublitz had already asked the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH) the question shown below. His correspondence is posted at the following link, along with the evasive response provided by the NIH/NIAID Section Chief for Controlled Correspondence and Public Inquiries, Legislative Affairs and Correspondence Management Branch. Pdf showing the text and a photo of the actual emails: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/NIAID-reply-to-Ron-Bublitz-re-SARS-COV-2-isolation.pdf
Ron kindly provided a screenshot of his communications with NIAID, shown below.
Note that NIH/NIAID failed to answer any of Ron Bublitz’s questions and merely cited the same CDC study by Harcourt et al. mentioned above that indulged in the typical fraudulent “monkey business” approach to so-called “isolation” – as shown in the screenshot below).
June 10, 2022:Julia Spiegel, woman who acts as Deputy Legal Affairs Secretary under Gavin Newsom, the man who acts in California’s Office of the Governor, confessed to Kristen Welch that they have no record describing any alleged “SARS-COV-2” (or “variant”) being found in the bodily fluid/tissue of anyone on Earth and purified… by anyone, anywhere, ever… in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments (aka “science”): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Gavin-Newson-acting-as-Gov-California-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
January 27, 2022: Washington State Department of Health provided “installment #1” of records allegedly-but-not-really responsive to a FOI for studies in which alleged “SARS-COV-2” was found in the bodily fluid/tissue of sick people and purified. “Installment #1” is sci-fi comedy having nothing whatsoever to do with purification or a virus, titled “SARS-CoV-2 Sequencing and Variants in Washington State”. It begins: “Next generation sequencing is a set of laboratory methods that scientists use to scan a viral genome to determine the genome sequence of a virus.” Watch out for the sequel due July 25, 2022! The department also confessed that its lab: “has not attempted to isolate SARS-CoV-2 from any specimen or matrix. Nor does the PHL have in its possession isolated viable SARS-CoV-2 virus. The WAPHL performs diagnostic testing that is PCR based… Next generation sequencing is performed on SARS-CoV-2 positive patient samples using extracted genomic material, not virus isolates.” https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Washington-State-DOH-install-1-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
November 25, 2021: Kate Wilson, acting for Multnomah County Health Department, Portland, Oregon confirmed that a thorough search yielded no record of anyone on Earth having found and purified the alleged “SARS-COV-2” (via maceration, filtration and ultracentrifugation) from any bodily fluid/tissue of any sick person, anywhere, ever: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Multnomah-County-Oregon-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
March 11, 2022: University of Illinois confirmed for Natalia Litbarg, MD that: the university’s records custodians who, due to the nature of their work might have had records describing someone on Earth finding the alleged “SARS-COV-2” in the bodily fluids of a diseased host and purifying “it”, could not identify any such records: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/University-of-Illinois-PACKAGE.pdf
May 18, 2022: Jorge Perez, the man who acts as Deputy Health Officer, Public Health Investigation, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, confessed to Kristen Welch that there are no records of the alleged SARS-COV-2 being found in the bodily fluid/tissue of anyone and purified… by anyone, anywhere, ever… but apparently he is OK with the fact that virologists have no independent variable to use in any “virus” experiment and he thinks that “the county” has the “right” to terrorize people with their “doctrine”: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Los-Angeles-County-Dept-PH-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
Switzerland: November 2021: Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) January 2022: Institute of Virology and Immunology (IVI) Both failed to provide or cite, for the man inquiring, even 1 record of “SARS-COV-2” being found in the bodily fluids of any sick human and purified (which would be necessary so that “it” could be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments to determine if “it” actually exists): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Switzerland-IVI-and-FOPH-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
March 16, 2022: Larry Stinson, who acts as Director of Operations for the so-called “non-profit” Peterborough Public Health (PPH), confirmed that PPH and Thomas Piggott, the man who acts as Medical Officer of Health, have no record describing anyone on Earth finding and purifying any alleged SARS, H5N1, H1N1, MERS, Ebola, or SARS-COV-2 “virus” from the bodily fluids of any diseased human, ever… or any study that in Thomas’ opinion proves the existence of any of those alleged viruses… despite Thomas’ claim of having lived through all these alleged outbreaks: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Peterborough-PH-SARS-H5N1-H1N1-MERS-Ebola-SCV2-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
August 25, 2021: Peterborough Public Health and (outgoing) Medical Officer Dr. Rosana Salvaterra confirm they have no records describing purification of the alleged “SARS-COV-2”, “HIV” aka “human immunodeficiency virus”, “Hep B virus” or “Hep C virus” from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere. Which means they have zero proof of their existence. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Peterborough-PH-HIV-Hep-B-Hep-C-SARSCOV2-package-redacted.pdf
January 3, 2022: Sarah B. Kotler, J.D. (a lawyer), Director, Division of Freedom of Information, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) refused to formally respond to my FOIA request delivered to her via email… but also indicated that the FDA has no record describing purification of “SARS-COV-2” from any patient sample on Earth, by anyone, anywhere, ever. She also failed to answer my question re what she will do with the knowledge that no one on the planet has any proof of “the virus”, despite being a “public servant” working for an agency that has been rubber-stamping all manner of “COVID-19” devices, injections, etc. She also called me “rude”, meanwhile she appears quite content to go along with worldwide fraud and violations of the Nuremberg Code: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/FDA-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
July 28, 2022: Some anonymous man or woman working in the Regulation and Ethics Department of the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products, France aka L’Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM) responded to my FOI for records of anyone on Earth finding and purifying the hypothesized convid virus from any bodily fluid/tissue of anyone on the planet. According to my colleague Marc Gray’s translation, this man or womanindicated that the ANSM is not authorized to verify the existence of alleged viruses unless doing so is “necessary in the context of a request concerning a drug or a micro-organism“, which according to them is not the case with their “pandemic” activity. “The requested documents do not exist within the ANSM” and science “does not fall within the scope of competence of the ANSM“. So good to know. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/France-ANSM-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
January 2022: Romania’s Ministry of Health / Institute of Public Health Bucharest and National Center for Surveillance and Control of Communicable Diseases failed to provide/cite any record of the alleged “SARS-COV-2” having been found in the bodily fluids of any patient on Earth and purified, so that “it” could be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments… and thus shown to exist:https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Romania-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
March 4, 2022: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene suddenly denied a FOIL request from Louis Stephen that had included the following: “The information I am requesting is: 1) Proof of isolation or an isolate of the SARS-COV-2 virus”, with this explanation: “your request does not reasonably describe the records you are requesting“: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/NYC-Dept-Health-and-Mental-Hygiene-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
March 21, 2022: New York City Department of Health and Hospitals says “Our research department conducted a diligent search for all the prospective COVID protocols for purification methods/description of SARS-Cov2 and couldn’t find any responsive records to your FOIL request. The facility research teams at Health + Hospitals have confirmed that they did not perform any purification methods of the virus. Also, please note that H+H does not do research lab benchwork.” See page 3: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/New-York-City-Dept-of-Health-Hospitals-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
March 30, 2022: New York City’s Office of the Mayor: In response to a request for records describing isolation/purification of the alleged “SARS-COV-2” from a sample taken from a diseased human, the Mayor’s office disclosed that: “After conducting a search, the Mayor’s Office has not found any records responsive to your request“: Pdf:https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/NYC-Office-of-Mayor-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 29, 2021: Metro Public Health Department, Nashville, Tennessee advised that “No such record(s) exists, or this office does not maintain record(s) responsive to” a request from Irucka Embry re purification of the alleged “SARS-COV-2” or the complete matching of “virus genomic sequences” from victims of the alleged virus in Metro Nashville and Wuhan, China. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Metro-PHD-Nashville-Tennessee-redacted-PACKAGE.pdf
June 13, 2022: Rosemary Hewig acting as “Esq., Records Access Officer”, New York State Department of Health reassured Louis that that they are still diligently searching for records proving the existence of “SARS-COV-2” and will only need until August 17, 2022 to respond to his FOI dated January 4, 2022: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/NY-State-DOH-June-13-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf Rosemary seems to have forgotten her earlier responses to my friend Bill Huston and I wherein she confessed that the people running NYS DoH have no record indicating that “SARS-COV-2” has ever been isolated, below.
December 9, 2021: 10 short months is all it took for the New York State Department of Health to provide William Huston with a meaningless list of imaginary “SARS-COV-2” variants in response to his request for records indicating that “the virus” has been isolated. And, on February 25, 2022, they finally concluded their “diligent search” for records responsive to my purification request dated November 5, 2021, and confirmed that they found no records: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/NYS-Dept-Health-WH-CM-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
May 10, 2022: Belgium’s Sciensano (Belgian institute for health) coordinates a Risk Assessment Group “in charge of assessing risks to public health in a national and international context“, validates procedures in the context of “COVID-19” and “has a legally determined surveillance task in the context of public health” (p3 here). So naturally Sciensano confirmed for Max De Cleyn that they have never found and purified the alleged virus from the bodily fluid/tissue of any patient and do not know who might have: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Belgium-Sciensano-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
Japan’s National Institute of Infectious Diseases This is what I’m told about the 2 letters shown below:
“The first photo… is from this tweet (the requester’s own account): https://twitter.com/un4yRFGlfQRAIZD/status/1422586472616513541 National Institute of Infectious Diseases says that they have no documents for the scientific evidence, papers, etc. about the existence of SARS-CoV-2. The 2nd one is from this tweet (left): https://twitter.com/dhBGGFoCRYyPo4u/status/1470999015534006274 Here National Institute of Infectious Diseases says that they have no documents for the scientific evidence, papers, etc. about the existence of SARS-CoV-2, physical samples, and the records of viral isolation. (The photo right side is the request about influenza virus. They have no documents, physical samples, either.) For your information, this is the paper of the “SARS-CoV-2 viral isolation” by National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan. Here they introduce the new type of Vero cells they have newly developed… https://www.pnas.org/content/117/13/7001“ Here is a pdf containing all 3 letters: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Japan-Natl-Inst-of-Infec-Dis.pdf
March 18, 2022: In response to a request for records describing isolation/purification of the alleged “SARS-COV-2” from a sample taken from a sick patient, Finland’s Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) stated the following: “the term ‘isolate’ has been used in a different sense in the request for information than is well established in science and that ‘isolating’ any virus within the meaning of the request for information is not at all possible“. Pdf: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Finland-Inst-for-Health-and-Welfare-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 22 2021: Finland’s Institute for Health and Welfare responded to a request for evidence that the alleged “SARS-COV-2” had been purified and shown to cause “COVID-19” symptoms in humans, with a paper about cytopathic effects in starved and poisoned monkey cells. The requester subsequently notified the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity of research misconduct, but the Board insisted that a preliminary investigation would be inappropriate. Because science. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Finland-Inst-for-Health-and-Welfare-THL-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
June 21, 2021. Via Dr. Fabio Franchi, author of “COVID-19. The catastrophe caused by the virus that is not there“, Dr. Maria Rosaria Capobianchi, Director of Virology, Istituto Nazionale per le Malattie Infettive Lazzaro Spallanzani (National Institute of Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani), Italy failed to provide or cite even 1 record re purification of the alleged COVID-19 virus aka “SARS-COV-2”.
September 2, 2021: The Commonwealth of Virginia Department of General Services provided allegedly responsive records that contained zero descriptions of “SARS-COV-2” purification from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, anywhere. The allegedly (but not really) responsive records are 1): the CDC’s 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, and 2) ThermoFisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 Combo Kit Procedure for the Detection of 2019-nCoV RNA by RTPCR. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Virginia-Dept-of-General-Services-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
August 9, 2021: The Arkansas Department of Health‘s Deputy General Counsel advised Dr. James W. Smith that the Department has no record describing the purification of any “SARS-COV-2” (including any scariants) from any patient sample on the planet, by anyone, ever, via filtration and ultra-centrifugation. He did however provide 2 emails re “looking for COVID 19 in wastewater” – lol. Dr. Smith will be following up to request that the response be provided in a formal, signed and dated letter with a file number. Full correspondence: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Arkanas-Dept-of-Health-no-records-email-response-Aug-9-redacted.pdf
After a series of Freedom of Information requests beginning in April 2020 failed to yield any satisfactory response, Ricardo Maarman (working alongside Dr. Faiez Kirsten) challenged the South African government in the Western Cape High Court in May 2021 to provide proof of “the virus” that allegedly justifies that government’s devastating lockdown measures.
(More specifically, Ricardo challenged the President, the National Department of Health, the Governmental COVID-19 Advisory Committee and the Minister of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs. And the responding affidavit was authored primarily by the Acting Executive Director of South Africa’s National Institute for Communicable Diseases.)
The government failed to provide proof or even compelling evidence, and on pages 29+ of their responding affidavit (starting on page 31 of the pdf) revealed that they have relied on a “well established” but unscientific approach to “virus isolation”.
The SA government’s affidavit artfully implies that Koch’s Postulates (or a variation therefore) have been fulfilled for the alleged “virus” when in fact none of them have been. It contains no mention of purification of the particles that have been shown in EM images (within cell cultures, never purified or in patient samples!) alleged to be “the virus”, or the characterization or sequencing of purified particles, or any controlled experiment involving purified particles.
And the SA government’s discussion of the Bradford-Hill criteria glosses over the fact that these criteria presuppose the existence and valid measurement of the potentially causative factor under investigation, when the reality is that no test ever has been or could have been validated for the never-purified, never-characterized, never-sequenced particles alleged to be “the virus”.
The judge ruled that the matter is not urgent and struck the matter from her roll. Ricardo will be pursuing this further. The notice of motion, hearing transcript, court ruling, other documentation and interviews about this case are posted on a dedicated website: https://www.showusthevirus.info.
A Lisbon court document dated May 19, 2021 is posted on the website of Andre Dias, PhD (as reported by Celia Farber at “The Truth Barrier,” celiafarber.substack.com).
According to Ms. Farber’s published June 28, 2021 email interview with Dias, who is an expert in lung disease modeling, the court ruling is in regards to a citizen’s petition to the Ministry of Health, “equivalent to a Freedom of Information Request…that ended up in court – with epidemiological and statistical queries“, and “the court also formalized that the ministry has no data or references about the existence of the virus…”
Ms. Farber advises that an English translation of the court ruling is in the works and will be shared on her website once it’s prepared. Below is a screenshot from the original document showing some of the questions that had been posed to Portugal’s Ministry of Health, for which they apparently had no answers.
July 2021: Brazil’s Ministry of Health provided/cited zero records of “SARS-COV-2” purification for the FOI submitter, Marcella Picone. The Ministry initially claimed that the request (that the rest of world understood just fine) was unclear, but also admitted “information non-existent”. In their 2nd response to Ms. Picone they explained that they have been following research conducted by other countries. See ps 2, 13, 14. Full responses: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Brazil-Ministry-of-Health-package.pdf
The Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa) is an FDA-like quackcine-approver. In their FOI response to Marcella Picone, they explained that they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification and are not required to by law, thus it is (in their minds) not their obligation to make sure that “the virus” actually exists. Full communication: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Brazil-ANVISA-package.pdf
At the next link (from the website of award-winning investigate journalist Torsten Engelbrecht and co-author of the book Virus Mania) is an email from Dr. Michael Laue, Head of the Consultant Laboratory for Diagnostic Electron Microscopy of Infectious Pathogens at Germany’s Robert Koch Institut (RKI), an institute “within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health” and responsible for disease control and prevention: https://www.torstenengelbrecht.com/wp-content/uploads/RKI_noSARSCoV2purification-1.pdf
The starting point for this paper is a so-called SARS-COV-2 isolate named “MUC-IMB1” (referred to simply as “MUC-1” in the paper’s supporting materials). Turonova et al. credit G. Dobler of the Bundeswehr Institute for Microbiology for providing them this “isolate”.
I contacted Dr. Gerhard Dobler to confirm details about “MUC-1” (which goes by several different names including Germany/BavPat1/2020), and it turns out that MUC-1 is another result of the monkey-business methodology cited at the top of this page. (The emails and more details are posted here: MUC-1 aka MUC-IMB1: just more Corman/Drosten monkey business fraud.) MUC-1 is not isolated/purified “virus” nor was it ever shown to contain any “virus”.
Also on Torsten Engelbrecht’s website are links to email responses from authors of “SARS-COV-2” studies, starting with the Zhu et al paper cited above by Dr. Michael Laue. None provided any evidence or assurance re purification of “the virus”. The following is copied and pasted from Torsten’s homepage:
“Na Zhu et al. (NEJM): “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones” (see Email).
Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris (Nature Medicine): “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus” (see Email).
Sharon R. Lewin et al. (The Medical Journal of Australia): ““The nucleic acid extraction was performed on isolate material recovered from infected cells. This material was not centrifuged, so was not purified through sucrose gradient to have a density band as such. The EM images were obtained directly from cell culture material” (see Email).
Myung-Guk Han et al. (Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives): “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells” (see Email).
Wan Beom Park et al. (Journal of Korean Medical Science): “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” (see Email).”
January 13, 2021: Norway’s Ministry of Health and Care Services failed to provide or cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation from a sample from a symptomatic patient, where the sample was not adulterated with additional genetic material, by anyone anywhere, for the requester Martiens Bekker. Request and response with English translation: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Norway-Ministry-of-Health-cites-no-records.pdf
January 13, 2023: Oregon Health Authority refused disclosure of all unpublished records re 21 queries re imaginary “SARS-COV-2”
A colleague sought records containing info about the “Oregon Health Authority’s” purported investigation into the imaginary “virus”, from 21 different angles; Jeanne Windham, a woman acting as Public Records and Internal Litigation Process Coordinator, insisted that all “information obtained by Oregon Health Authority or a local public health administrator in the course of a reportable disease or disease outbreak investigation… is confidential under state law“… which sounds just a tad fishy, especially considering that convid “cases” are fraudulently classified as such based on tests that don’t test for a virus (as David Icke calls them) and which cannot detect any disease, reportable or otherwise, and that the alleged reportable coronavirus disease has – along with “the virus” – never been shown to exist; https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Oregon-Health-Authority-many-issues-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
January 31, 2022: Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR, “the apex body in India for formulation, coordination & promotion of biomedical research”) confirmed for the requester that they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” being found in the bodily fluids of any sick human and purified (which would be necessary so that “it” could be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments to determine if “it” actually exists): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ICMR-Jan-2022.pdf
December 7, 2021: “There is no methodology to purify the SARS-COV-2 directly from the clinical specimens of patients until the virus is isolated using in vitro or in vivo methods”, said no coherent man or woman ever. Nevertheless, this is the latest response from Indian Council of Medical Research (“the apex body in India for formulation, coordination & promotion of biomedical research”) to a request for records of purification.
May 3, 2021: Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR, “the apex body in India for formulation, coordination & promotion of biomedical research”) has failed to provide/cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification for the requester (who asked to keep both their name and file # private); instead they cited a typical example of “monkey-business” fraud – exactly what the requester had asked not to receive.
Note that ICRM has fraudulently claimed to have isolated “the virus” and the imaginary UK scariant, to have been tracking “the virus” across India, has developed a COVID-19 quackcine, shares ownership rights on the quackcine and is a member of guess WHO’s Global Health Workforce Network.
The 1 record cited by ICMR is a correspondence entitled “First isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from clinical samples in India” published in the Indian Journal of Medical Research which is a journal published for the ICRM. According to the correspondence “The designated COVID-19 testing laboratories …referred the specimens …to the Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute of Virology (ICMR-NIV), Pune, after screening for envelope (E) gene by realtime RT-PCR was done.” Three of of co-the authors are affiliated with ICRM.
Yash, the requester for the above FOI to ICMR, then appealed the ICMR’s response, pointing out that the study cited by ICMR was exactly what he had specified he was not requesting (because it has nothing to do with isolating/purifying an alleged “virus”). The July 12, 2021 response to his appeal: “The reply provided to the applicant is in order and satisfactory.” Yash’s appeal and response: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ICMR-first-APPEAL-package.pdf
June 28, 2021, the IndianCouncil of Medical Research (ICMR) once again fails to provide/cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification and cites more “monkey-business” fraud, this time through their National Institute of Virology. Note the World Health Organization logo and reference in the footer of the letter. Here is the URL for the image: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/India-ICMR.jpeg
Next is a 2nd FOI response of June 28 2021 from the Indian Council of Medical Research failing again to provide/cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification and citing the same anti-science papers, this time in response to requester Trinayan Das. ICMR was also asked additional questions re PCR, and responded that it is the “gold standard” for detection (“very accurately”! “confirms the presence”!!). Full response: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/ICMR-June-28-2.pdf
September 14, 2021: Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences (Ústav organické chemie a biochemie AV ČR, v. v. i. (Prague) advised that they have never purified the alleged COVID-19 virus from any patient sample, but convinced themselves they had a sample of “it” by fabricating a “genome” from RNA sequences found in their monkey cell culture.https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Czech-UOCHB-FOI-ANSWER-14.9.2021.pdf
I personally cannot read these Czech documents, but was told: Univerzita Karlova: “This from the No.1 university in Czech R. As answer, they inform us, that “there is broad consensus in the international scientific community” about precise RNA sequence of SARS-Cov2, about its chemical and protein structure and it causing COVID19.” Thus Univerzita Karlova failed to provide any record proving the purification or existence of “the virus”: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Czech-university.pdf
Czech Ministry of Health: “This is the response of Czech ministry of health. When a proof of existence of the SARS-Cov2 virus was requested…” The references cited by the Ministry are in English and do not describe purification of an alleged virus, let alone scientific study of such. Full letter: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Czech-ministry-of-health.pdf
I personally cannot read this next document from the Ukraine’s Ministry of Health dated March 15, 2021, but am told that the Ministry stated here that they do not have any “SARS-COV-2” isolate, nor do they intend to obtain any.
August 24, 2021: Sweden’s Public Health Authority also can’t find “the virus”. John Blaid submitted a formal FOI request to for records describing purification of “the virus” from any patient sample (not adulterated with genetic material, i.e. monkey cells, fetal bovine serum) on the planet, by anyone, anywhere. The response: “No, no such documents exist.” Full correspondence: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Sweden-Public-Health-Authority-FHM-2021-08-24.pdf
October 18, 2021: Sweden’s Karolinska Institute was unable to provide or cite any record of SARS-CoV-2 isolation/purification for John Blaid. According to John: “This is the answer they gave me translated from Swedish:
“Hello John! The registrar and the communications department at Karolinska Institute have now replied that they do not have access to this information.At present, the university library does not have the opportunity to perform search assignments for external customers. One suggestion is to do a search in the freely available database PubMed. If you have the opportunity to visit us, you can also use other databases. https://kib.ki.se/om-kib/kontakt-oppettider PubMed contains the MeSH term SARS-CoV-2 / isolation and purification, which currently provides 5251 references.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22SARS-CoV-2%2Fisolation+and+purification%22&sort=relevance.””
April 26, 2021: Once again the Dutch Minister for Health, Well-being & Sport (the Netherlands) replied to an FOI sent to its agency RIVM (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) re purification of “the virus”; the Minister provided/cited zero such records for Gabriëlle Rutten, and cited cell culture anti-science instead. Full correspondence: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Wob-verzoek-no-records-package.pdf
March 15, 2022: The Dutch Minister for Health, Well-being & Sport (Netherlands) responded to a request for “reliable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 (or any other so-called virus) has been isolated from an “unadulterated sample from a sick patient” (or a sick animal) and that that so-called virus can be transmitted to another person (or animal) and then cause the same so-called disease there” with 2 nonresponsive studies that describe the fabrication of “genomes” never shown to correspond to anything in the physical realm, and “isolation” in cell culture (oxymoron). https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/1Netherlands-Min-Health-Welfare-Sport-PACKAGE-redacted-updated-Nov-2022.pdf
January 19, 2022: Department of Health and Social Care, Isle of Man (British Isles) confirmed for Courtenay Adam-Lawrence that they have no record of the following for either the alleged “Omicron” or “Kent Strain” of the imaginary “SARS-COV-2”: – unique whole genome sequence – test procedures – isolation/purification – contagion – confirmation that “it’ is not simply an in-silico computer made-up model of a strain of a virus: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Isle-of-Man-DHSC.pdf
August 9, 2022: Jan Torres, acting as Manager, OIA Services, Ministry of Health, New Zealand, has confessed to my colleague Michael S. that no one at the Ministry has any records that scientifically demonstrate the existence of “SARS-COV-2″ or that “it” causes “COVID-19”. Further, they see no reason on Earth to think that any government agency does, and so naturally this makes Michael’s requests “vexatious” and they’d really rather never hear from him again. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/NZ-MOH-no-science-re-Existance-and-Causation-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
July 29, 2022: Back in July, some anonymous man or woman working for Ministerial Services, Labour, Science and Enterprise, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, New Zealand confessed to my colleague Michael S. that, despite their quarantine policy, it would be too much work for anyone at MBIE to search their records for any that scientifically prove the existence of SARS-COV-2. They refused Michael’s FOI on this basis, and also claimed that the required records are publicly available, and that they “understand” that the virus exists based on hearsay evidence. Michael followed up with a complaint, seeking remedy via provision of the alleged records or a retraction of MBIA’s claim that the virus exists. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/NZ-Min-Business-Innovd-Employ-no-science-re-existence.pdf
August/September 2022 update: An anonymous complaint response letter indicates that “MBIE formed part of the all of government response to COVID-19” (sic) and the people at MBIE stand by their reliance on hearsay evidence. Further, they admitted to Michael that “you are however correct that we cannot identify a specific piece of information which falls within the specific parameters of your request“, but continued to refuse his FOI based on their assumptions that they 1) do have scientific records and 2) it would take too much work to find them. They concluded by suggesting that Michael give up and talk to the Ministry of Health instead… as if he hadn’t already done that repeatedly since 2020. Michael followed this inanity with another complaint, again seeking remedy via provision of the alleged scientific records or an admission that no such records exist. The latest anonymous complaint response letter from MBIE indicates that they stand by 1) their reliance on hearsay, 2) their assumption that they do have scientific records, and 3) their refusal of the FOI on the grounds that attempting to confirm their assumption would be too much work and would unreasonably impact their criminal racket operations. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/NZ-MBIE-complaint-responses-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
January 28, 2022: New Zealand’s Security Intelligence Service confirmed they have no record of anyone on the planet ever having found the alleged “SARS-COV-2” in the fluids taken from any diseased human, so that “it” could be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments… to see if “it” actually exists as claimed: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/2022-01-28-NZ-SIS-SARS-COV-2-v3-redacted.pdf
January 28, 2022: New Zealand’s Government Communications Security Bureau admitted they have no record of anyone on the planet ever having found the alleged “SARS-COV-2” in the fluids taken from any diseased human, so that “it” could be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments… to see if “it” actually exists as claimed: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/2022-01-28-NZ-GCSB-SARS-COV-2-v3-redacted.pdf
January 25, 2022: New Zealand’s Ministry of Justice admitted they have no record of anyone on the planet ever having found the alleged “SARS-COV-2” in the fluids taken from any diseased human, so that “it” could be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments… to see if “it” actually exists as claimed: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/2022-01-25-NZ-MoJ-SARS-COV-2-v3-redacted.pdf
November 19, 2021: Tauranga City Council, New Zealand advised the requester that they have no record describing purification of any “SARS-COV-2” or “variants” from any patient sample, by anyone, anywhere… …however they do take 24 hour wastewater composite samples, send them to ESR for meaningless “analysis” and “tests” (that have no gold standard and thus are impossible to validate) which are then forwarded to the Ministry of Health. Because science. Pdf: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Tauranga-City-Council-SARS-COV-2-v3-redacted-2021-11-19-.pdf
July 19, 2022: Jill Vintiner, acting as Joint General Manager, Health and Environment Group, Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR – crown research institute), New Zealand has issued yet another confession on behalf of everyone at ESR, this time stating that…. they have no record that scientifically proves the existence of the alleged “SARS-COV-2”: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/NZ-ESR-No-Proof-Of-Existence.pdf
July 12, 2022: Jill Vintiner, acting as Joint General Manager, Health and Environment Group, Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR – crown research institute), New Zealand has issued yet another confession on behalf of everyone at ESR that: they have no record of the phantom “SARS-COV-2” (including any “variants”) being found in and purified from the bodily fluid/tissue of anyone on the planet, by anyone, anywhere, ever. Jill also provided unhelpful, irrelevant links to documentation on nucleic acid isolation kits, claiming they have been used to purify RNA from said phantom never-shown-to-exist “virus”. (Jill irrationally equates purification of RNA taken from heterogenous soups – i.e. monkey/cow/human/bacteria/fungi mixtures – with purification of RNA from a purely theoretical virus.) https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/NZ-ESR-July-2022-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
Here are 5 pages of pure gold, evidencing masterful evasion plus stunning incompetence and/or fraud from New Zealand’s Ministry of Health. Instead of providing the requests records of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification and proof of accurate diagnostic tests, they blathered about genomes and cultures of the never-isolated imaginary virus; stated that PCR tests have been validated around the world and are the gold standard; and cited a February 2020 preliminary report (“The Pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 Transgenic Mice”) that used the so-called “SARS-COV-2” strain that had been concocted by Zhu et al. and claimed that Koch’s Postulates had been fulfilled. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/NZ-Min-Health-2nd-FOI-no-records.pdf
March 22, 2021, New Zealand’s Ministry of Heath confirms they still have no record describing purification of “the virus” and hence zero proof of its existence, and they choose to cite fraudulent studies instead (the infamous Harcourt et al. study mentioned above and the Australian paper cited at the top of this page). Full pdf response: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/2021-03-22-NZ-MOH-Purification-SARS-COV-2-redacted.pdf
June 22, 2022: Kelsey Kennard acting in the Office of the Registrar at New Zealand’s University of Otago confessed to Michael S. that the paper titled “Characterization of the First SARS-CoV-2 Isolates from Aotearoa New Zealand as Part of a Rapid Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic” by “virologist” Miguel Quiñones-Mateu is merely a descriptive paper with no hypothesis and nothing to prove or disprove… in other words Miguel employed no scientific method and his paper cannot accurately be called “science”. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/2022-06-22-University-of-Otago-Scientific-Method-Response-Redacted-Complete.pdf
October 2020 / updated March 2022: New Zealand’s University of Auckland was disappointingly non-cooperative, opting for a sketchy “refusal” of my colleague’s request. Let’s face it, if the University actually had any such records (that no one else on the planet appears have) and they are publicly available, the University of Auckland would have proudly provided links/citations. But they didn’t. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Auckland-redacted-FOI-emails-updated-2022.pdf
August 1, 2022: Jim Mercer acts as Chief Operating Officer at University of Waikato in New Zealand. The university published a blog in April 2021 entitled “Sam Bailey on isolating viruses, and why she is wrong”. The blog is still posted on the university’s website. Jim confessed to Michael S. that there are no records containing scientific proof of the existence of the alleged SARS-COV-2 at U of Waikato. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/U-of-Waikato-no-SARS-COV-2-Existance-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
October 18, 2022: My colleague Michael S. required Ayesha Verrall, who plays “Associate Minister of Health” in New Zealand, to provide her scientific proof of the existence of “SARS-COV-2“. Instead, Ayesha sent him links to the strictly in silico transcript called MN908947 that corresponds to nothing in the physical realm (discussed here), and various other unhelpful webpages. Michael responded by pointing out the uselessness of Ayesha’s response and laid out the remedy that he requires of her: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/NZ-Health-Min-Ayehsa-Verrall-PACKAGE-redacted-Oct-2022.pdf
August 18, 2022: Annabel Kent, acting as Legal Counsel for “Australia’s national science research agency”, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation aka CSIRO has confessed to my colleague Michael S. that no one at CSIRO has any records that scientifically demonstrate the existence of “SARS-COV-2“. We find this especially interesting given that CSIRO has a so-called dangerous pathogens research team (https://sciencejobs.org/posting/7089260) and people at CSIRO are complicit in so-called “COVID-19 vaccine” trials using the fake “SARS-COV-2 isolate” from Doherty Institute. Pdf: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Aug-18-CSIRO-SARS-COV-2-Proof-of-Existance-Redacted.pdf
And, in February 2022, so-called scientists at Australia’s Doherty Institute confessed to Marvin Haberland (via Eugene Toh, acting as Information Regulation Officer, University of Melbourne) that they neglected to use adequate controls when “sequencing”/assembling their in silico “SARS-COV-2 genome”, and thus admitted that their result is anti-scientific: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Doherty-Inst-no-controls-Marvin-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
(January 27, 2022: Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation – CSIRO (“Australia’s national science research agency”) have also confirmed they have no record containing details of any “controls” used in anti-science, so-called “virus isolation” cell culture procedures or “whole genome sequencing” procedures: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/2022-01-27-CSIRO-SARS-COV-2-Controls-redacted.pdf)
The next FOI letter shown in the screenshot below is in response to a request that was submitted on the advice of Australia’s Department of Health, and has come to us via John Blaid. Addressed to Mary-Jane Liddicoat, the formal but undated letter was authored sometime after March 9, 2021 by Dr. Nick Coatsworth, Executive Director of Medical Services, Canberra Health Services (CHS), ACT Government (Government of the Australian Capital Territory).
[When reviewing Coatsworth’s response, bear in mind the following facts provided us by Darren Christison, a journalist in Sydney, Australia: “This is the same Dr Nick Coatsworth who is the ‘poster boy’ for the Australian government’s push to vaccinate everyone until they urinate the poison, and has been a permanent fixture on TV and online in recent months (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aep_RKawTWc). He’s also the same Dr Nick Coatsworth who recently, according to The Sydney Morning Herald, ‘admonished a “hardcore rump of activist doctors” spreading misinformation and undermining vaccine confidence” (https://www.smh.com.au/national/former-deputy-chief-doc-warns-australia-must-reopen-borders-prepare-for-the-return-of-covid-19-20210514-p57s1u.html).]
Mar 16 2021: Western Australia Minister & Department of Health confirm they have no record of “SARS-COV-2” purification from any patient sample on the planet (and thus zero proof that “the virus” exists), and that PathWest Laboratory Medicine only does the quackery version of “virus isolation”. Full communications: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Western-Australia-no-records-package.pdf
University of Sheffield and (professor) Carl Smythe (who have partnered with Paraytec Limited to develop a fake-covid test that “works” in 5 minutes) claim to have records describing “purification” of the imaginary “virus” but they also:
1) define “purification” as a mere processin which (alleged) biological substances are progressively enriched, compared with the original source material – not necessarily resulting in separation of alleged “virus” particles from everything else in a sample of bodily fluid/tissue/excrement, and potentially involving the addition of genetic material to the patient sample, 2) refuse to release the records for public scrutiny because doing so would jeopardize their commercial interests: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fake-covid-test-developers-carl-smythe-u-of-sheffield-paraytec-limited-and-a-virus-foi/
June 23, 2022: Once again, folks (or perhaps just an AI platform) at the UK’s euphemistically-named Health Security Agency failed to provide/cite any record at HSA or Public Health England describing purification of the imaginary “SARS-COV-2” from a clinical sample, since no such record exists, anywhere on Earth, because virology is pseudoscience: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/UK-HSA-and-PHE-2022-06-23.jpg
June 30, 2022: The UK Health Security Agency and Public Health England have confessed once again that they have never found and purified any alleged convid virus from clinical samples (but cagily avoided admitting that they have no record of anyone on the planet ever doing this)… and they provided useless time-wasting links to useless time-wasting webpages… because “science”. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/UK-HSA-and-PHE-July-2022-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
April 9, 2022: This FOI response from Metropolitan Police, UK very strongly suggests that the people involved in their COVID-19 crime investigation (reference number 6029679/21) are either: 1) wildly unorganized and incompetent, or 2) participating in a cover-up of worldwide fraud and crimes against humanity. We required the people acting for Metro Police to provide records that they ought to have sought as part of their investigation – records describing the first and absolutely essential (but not sufficient) step in proving the existence of the alleged “virus” (purification from bodily fluid/tissue), OR, if they have no such records (since none exist anywhere in the world) studies that in their opinion prove the existence of “SARS-COV-2”. The people at Metropolitan Police claim that they would need more than 18 hours to search for said records, and hide behind an exemption based on said claim. See page 22: “DECISION This letter is to inform you that it will not be possible to respond to your request within the cost threshold…Please also note that when one part of a request is refused because the cost of completing that part of the request would exceed the appropriate limit, this results in the refusal of the request in its entirety…. REASON FOR DECISION Section 12(2) – Exemption where cost of compliance exceeds appropriate limit The Section 12 Exemption applies because any attempt to fulfil this request would require an extensive manual search to ascertain whether any of the information requested is held… The appropriate limit has been specified in regulations and for agencies outside central Government, this is set at £450.00. This represents the estimated cost of one person spending 18 hours [at a rate of £25 per hour] in determining whether the MPS holds the information and then locating, retrieving and extracting the information.” (As noted in my response: “Philip Hyland tells me that one of the first points he made in the crime complaint was that there was an onus on the MHRA to establish whether the virus really exists, and he referred to my worldwide collection of FOIs responses showing that no queried public body held an isolated/purified virus and hence could not scientifically establish existence. I also provided 2 statements to the investigative team, advising them of the FOIs and their significance based on simple logic that anyone can understand.”) https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/London-MOPAC-and-MPS-final-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
March 8, 2022: London Mayor’s Office for Policing And Crime (MOPAC) confirmed they have no record of the alleged SARS-COV-2 being found in and purified from any diseased human on the planet, by anyone, anywhere, ever,and that the men in charge of the Metropolitan Police COVID-19 crime investigation (file number 6029679/21) that was wrongfully shut down also have no record to proves “its” alleged existence. See page 8: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/London-MOPAC-and-MPS-final-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
January 14, 2022: The UK Cabinet Office once again confirmed for Marc Horn that they have no record of: – the alleged “virus” having been found in the bodily fluids of any patient on Earth and purified so that “it” could be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments; – a unique RNA sequence that is tested for by any testing method which identifies the presence of the imaginary virus and no other genetic material; – an unique harm caused by the imaginary virus; – experimental evidence of transmission of the imaginary virus: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/817480/response/1951835/attach/3/CO%20FOI%20response%20FOI2021%2023894.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1
November 18, 2021: The unidentified people working on the Disclosures Team, Customer Relations and Information, Cheshire West and Chester Council, UK confessed to our dedicated FOI-filer in England that they have no record describing any alleged “Zika virus, HIV, Ebolavirus, Polio virus, MERS virus, Measles virus, HPV, Influenza virus or SARSCOV-2” being found in the bodily fluid/tissue of anyone on Earth and purified, by anyone, anywhere, ever in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments (aka “science”).
October 22, 2021: Someone at Somerset County Council, United Kingdom confessed to our dedicated FOI friend in England that no one there has any record that describes any alleged “SARS-COV-2” being found in the bodily fluid/tissue of anyone on Earth and purified, by anyone, anywhere, ever… in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments (aka “science”): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Somerset-County-Council-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
October 28th, 2021: Steve Hanratty who acts as a Business Manager, Sunderland City Council, UK confessed to our dedicated FOI-filer in England that the people of Sunderland City Council have no record of any alleged “SARS-COV-2″ being found in the bodily fluid/tissue of a human and purified… in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments (aka “science”): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Sunderland-City-Council-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
November 1, 2021: Wiltshire Council, UK confessed to our dedicated FOI-filer in England that they have no record describing any alleged “SARS-COV-2” (or “variant”) being found in the bodily fluid/tissue of anyone on Earth and purified… by anyone, anywhere, ever… in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments (aka “science”): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Wiltshire-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
November 4, 2021: The “Information Management Team” at London Borough of Hackney confessed to our dedicated FOI-collector in England that they have no record describing any alleged “SARS-COV-2” (or “variant”) being found in the bodily fluid/tissue of anyone on Earth and purified… by anyone, anywhere, ever… in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments (aka “science”): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/LONDON-HACKNEY-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
October 21, 2021: Kirklees Council confessed to our dedicated FOI-collector in England that they have no record describing any alleged “SARS-COV-2” (or “variant”) being found in the bodily fluid/tissue of anyone on Earth and purified… by anyone, anywhere, ever… in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments (aka “science”):https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Kirklees-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
May 28, 2021: Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea confessed to our dedicated FOI-collector in England that they have no record describing any alleged “SARS-COV-2” (or “variant”) being found in the bodily fluid/tissue of anyone on Earth and purified… by anyone, anywhere, ever… in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments (aka “science”): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Royal-Borough-Kensington-and-Chelsea-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
December 14, 2021: London Borough of Bromley confirmed for the requester that they also have no record of ANY of the following alleged “viruses” having been purified from any patient sample, by anyone, anywhere on the planet, or any study proving a causal link to the suspected infectious diseases:
October 29, 2021: Norfolk County Council, East of England (covers Great Yarmouth) confirmed for the requester that they have no record of any alleged “SARS-COV-2” (including any scariants) having been found in and purified from the bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of any diseased “host” on the planet (in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments) by anyone, anywhere, ever. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Norfolk-UK-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
October 22, 2021: Lincolnshire County Council confirmed for the requester that they have no record of any “SARS-COV-2” having been purified from any patient sample, by anyone, anywhere on the planet, or any studies suggesting a causal link between “it” and the suspected infectious “COVID-19”: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Lincolnshire-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
October 25, 2021: Nottinghamshire County Council in the UK confirmed for Yvonne Hobbs that they have no record of any “SARS-COV-2” having been purified from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere on the planet, or any record proving a causal link between “it” and the suspected infectious disease “Covid-19”: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Nottinghamshire-1.pdf
December 13, 2021: Rutland County Council in the UK confirmed for Yvonne Hobbs that they have no record of any “SARS-COV-2” having been purified from a patient sample, by anyone, anywhere on the planet, or any record proving a causal link between “SARS-COV-2” and the suspected infectious disease “Covid-19”: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Rutland-sc2.pdf
October 20, 2021: Public Health London Hammersmith and Fulham in the UK confirmed for the requester that they have no record of any “COVID-19 virus/variant” purified from any patient sample by anyone, anywhere on the planet, and no record proving a causal link between the alleged virus and “COVID-19” – and thus zero evidence of “its” existence: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/London-Hammersmith-and-Fulham-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
September 10, 2021: Public Health Scotland confirmed once again, this time for Richard Anthony, that they have no purified sample of the alleged “COVID=19 virus/variants” and know of no one in Scotland who does, and they equated isolation/purification with meaningless, unscientific monkey cell culturing. Pdf: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Scotland-PH-FOI-2021-000848-2.pdf
February 15 and March 9, 2022: Scotland: The Scottish government’s Directorate for COVID Public Health, COVID: COVID Ready Society says that having a clear route for synthesising scientific evidence and presenting that to Government is important. Nevertheless, Jason Carroll also confirmed that the Scottish government has no record of “SARS-COV-2” being found in the bodily fluids of any sick human on Earth and purified… which would be necessary so that “it” could be sequenced, characterized, studied with controlled experiments and shown to exist. In March 2022, a response to an appeal re the above yielded confirmation – no records. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Scottish-govt-w-appeal-2022-PACKAGE.pdf
December 23, 2020: Ireland’s Health Service Executive (HSE) informed Mr. Robert Pye that they have no record describing isolation/purification of “SARS-COV-2” from any patient sample, by anyone, anywhere (I believe this is the response reported on by Gemma O’Doherty last year – I finally obtained a copy): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Ireland-HSE-PACKAGE.pdf
August/September 2022: Danni and Tonny in Denmark filed FOIs for records of any “virus” that authorities recommend children be “vaccinated” against being isolated/purified. Danni described the responses: “A doctor from Sundhedsstyrelsen says they don’t hold scientific evidence. They base the recommendations on the fact that they’ve been vaccinating children for decades. “And a lawyer from Statens Serum Institut searched the journal database and came up with nothing. He could not find anything matching my request. I had used the template from one of your FOIs on SARS COV 2.” https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Denmark-Statens-Serum-Institut-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
Statens Serum Institut, Denmark told Alex Holmsted that (translation): “The Statens Serum Institut can state that we have now carried out a journal search for documentation that has convinced the Statens Serum Institut about the real existence of SARS-CoV-2, the alleged cause of COVID19 and moreover, we have in some other way tried to locate relevant documents. Statens Serum Institut can note that we are not in possession of the requested documents...” https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Denmark-The-Statens-Serum-Instituttet-Alex_Holmstedt_w-English.pdf
Related video: Denmark health officials became indignant and defensive during a press conference when asked by journalist Kristofer Krarup about the FOI responses from their own institutions indicating they have zero proof of “the virus”: https://www.bitchute.com/video/AiwB5h4VCnTH/
Months ago, the StandUpX Science Committee published an open letter dated June 22, 2020 to the British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson. Below is a screenshot from their letter, demanding scientific proof of the alleged “COVID-19 virus”. (Their entire letter can be viewed and/or downloaded here: https://kevinpcorbett.com/onewebmedia/Signed%20StandUpX%20definitive.pdf)
StandUpX Committee member Piers Corbyn also made the demand verbally outside the headquarters of the UK government; video footage of the demand is available at this url (not the embedded video below – that is a different video featuring Peirs Corbyn; WordPress would not embed the footage of the demand for some reason, so please click on this url to see the demand, not on the image below): https://youtu.be/4FpuzGBa36c
Below is footage of Piers Corbyn calling out the UK government for the non-isolation of their theoretical “SARS-COV-2 virus”. https://www.bitchute.com/embed/1eDDh3eqFPAJ/?feature=oembed#?secret=fSiAIVe09M ERRATUM: In the description underneath the video (on the bitchute page) the authors of the publication on the Drosten PCR test are referred to has ‘Drosten et al’ when it should read ‘Croman et al’.
July 27, 2021: In England, the Pennine Acute National Health Service Trust and the Salford Royal National Health Service Foundation Trust disclosed in FOI responses: • that they have in total zero records re “SARSCov2” satisfying Koch’s Postulates (and yes, we know that a strict application of Koch’s would not be possible, even if the imaginary “virus” actually existed; note that these institutions provided plenty of unrequested data but no records whatsoever re “virus” isolation/purification); • PCR tests have been run with up to 42 cycles; • <10 children died within 28 days of a positive convid test; • “cause of death is not recorded in our clinical systems”. Full response: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/NCA-FOI-11135-package.pdf
Here is an exasperating email exchange between myself and Imperial College London, home of the disgraced “COVID-19” modeller Professor Neil Ferguson and Public Health England’s Deputy Director of National Infection Service and Director of Reference Microbiology Services, British virologist, Professor Maria Zambon FMedSci FRCPath. The College clearly has no records describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification but is unwilling to admit such: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Imperial-College-London-FOI-exchange-SARS-COV-2-isolation-updated.pdf
September 8, 2021: Spain’s Ministry of Health provided an uber-evasive response to an organization called Liberum, re isolation/purification, characterization, culturing etc. of the alleged COVID-19 virus. Here are the actual questions posed by Liberum (provided by a member), with an (automated) English translation, and the responses also with an (automated) English translation. The Ministry’s total evasion re purification, and their admission that they don’t even bother with bogus monkey cell cultures, speaks volumes: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Spain-Ministry-of-Health-Liberum-request-PACKAGE.pdf
March 7, 2023: European CDC confessed to having no record of the alleged “SARS-COV-2 spike protein” being found in and purified from any people who were diagnosed with fake covid or who received a so-called “mRNA vaccine”. The request ruled out studies where researchers did something with recombinant aka lab-created “spike protein” or where the alleged protein was “detected” indirectly using a nonspecific test. Thanks Barbara! https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Eurpoean-CDC-spike-protein-PACKAGE-redacted-03-2023.pdf
According to the website of Slovenia’s University of Ljubljana, their Faculty of Medicine has been involved in “…implementation of the latest molecular diagnostic procedures; an attempt to isolate the virus in cell cultures [oxymoron], which is a precondition for testing anti-viral agents and vaccines…“. The Faculty formally admitted on November 30, 2020 to having no record (even obtained from others) of “SARS-COV-2” isolation or proving a causal link to “COVID-19”; also that 40 PCR cycles have been used across Slovenia since the beginning of testing. The Faculty’s original response and an English translation are available here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/FOI-reply-Slovenia-University-of-Ljubljana-re-isolation.pdf
And more recently still, Slovenia’s National Laboratory for Health, Environment & Food (Nacionalnega laboratorija za zdravje, okolje in hrano, NLZOH – “the central and largest Slovenian public health laboratory that handles environmental protection, diagnostic and public health microbiological activities, chemical and microbiological analyses of different types of samples, and also performs research activities“) failed to provide or cite any record of “SARS-COV-2” purification or proof of existence, despite an intervention by the Information Commissioner. NLZOH also cited a “business secret” in responses re queries re PCR testing. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Slovenia-Lab-package-w-translations.pdf
December 22, 2021: Argentina’s National Administration of Laboratories and Health Institutes “Dr. Carlos Malbrán” is described as “a decentralized public body dependent on the Ministry of Health“, and is a Collaborating Center on Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance with guess “WHO”.
Monica Tous (“Virology Department Head”) responded to Edgar Horacio Russo’s request for records describing “SARS-COV-2” purification with a letter about PCR “tests”, “sequencing” of RNA soups, oxymoronic “virus isolation” attempts in monkey cell cultures, and this gem: “The LNR does not handle the use of the electron microscope.”
On February 15, 2021 Kepa Ormazabal submitted an FOI request re isolation/purification of the phantom “virus” to the Basque Country (Spain) Office of the President and Department of Health and all dependent institutions. Months later Kepa wrote: “According to the law, they have 30 days to respond; 60 if the question is especially complex. Today is May 2nd and I have not heard from them.”
On March 30, 2021 Kepa Ormazabal submitted another FOI request re isolation/purification of the phantom “virus” to the flagship of Spanish research, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas /Higher Council of Scientific Research (the image below indicates the reception of the request by the institution). Months later Kepa writes: “Again, they have not responded and, therefore, their silence is refusing access to the information they may hold in regards to my question.“
“The CSIC and the Basque government are public institutions and, therefore, must comply with the Ley de transparencia, buen gobierno y acceso a la información pública/Law of transparency, good governance and access to public information. Article 20.4 of this law states that, if after 30 days there has been no response from the public administration, this silence is to be understood as meaning that the request to access the public information solicited has been refused.”
Terrain: the Film The End of Germ Theory? from Andrew Kaufman M.D. and Marcelina Cravat
So “What The Hell Is Going?
At this point you might be scratching your head and wonder what on Earth is going on. If so, the collection of resources on the page linked below will reveal the fraud behind the fake pandemic known as “COVID-19”, as explained by various experts. The focus here is on the isolation/purification issue, the fake “genomes” and meaningless PCR tests that are at the heart of it all.
June 10, 2023: Here is a presentation that I did by myself, showing my webpages that contain the FOIs responses: Official Evidence that Virology is Pseudoscience – Christine Massey June 10 2023, Video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/gvu4NbieSuVb/
In late April 2023, I was honoured to be invited for an interview with the lovely and very talented Kate Sugak – naturopath, filmmaker, teacher. Here is the interview in English, and another version dubbed in Russian. Kate added many slides to the video to illustrate what we were talking about.
Later in January, 2023 (23rd?): Eric Coppolino, Michael Bryant and Christine Massey discuss RFK Jr. and Children’s Health Defense’s gatekeeping re virology (note: this is not the same Michael Bryant who acted as “attorney general of ontario”, murdered Darcy Allen Sheppard in a fit of road rage and got away with it)https://www.bitchute.com/embed/xmDzPAPzHR26/
January 2023: ALEC ZECK, TOM COWAN, ANDREW KAUFMAN, MARK BAILEY AND CHRISTINE MASSEY RESPOND TO (CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENCE “SCIENCE” ADVISOR) JJ COUEY https://www.bitchute.com/video/JCFqG9vaEiEE/
November 3, 2022: My interview with Jimuphy Masters of Planned Illuision (note: I made an error during this interview, in referring to Dr. Kevin McKernan when in fact I was talking about Kevin McCairn (a so-called scientist with a PhD). https://www.plannedillusion.com/news-weekly/episode84
January 6, 2022: This was my first-ever conversation with my great hero and inspiration, Dr. Tom Cowan. Conversations with Dr. Cowan & Friends| EP 44: Christine Massey https://www.bitchute.com/video/fBN2S8mR6ipP/
Audio: October 1, 2021: The Worldwide Hunt for SARS-CoV-2: Christine Massey Interview about her Freedom of Information Law responses — Eric F. Coppolino of Planet Waves FM: https://planetwaves.fm/worldwide-hunt-for-sars-cov-2/
August 10, 2021: DOES THE ‘VIRUS’ EXIST? HAS SARS-COV-2 BEEN ISOLATED? With Professor Michel Chossudovsky of Global Research (and here it is with Dutch subtitles)
On November 26, 2020 at a protest in Toronto, I was given a spur-of-the-moment opportunity to deliver a message to the Canadian government re their handing of “COVID-19”, via the mainstream media. Enjoy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5k-iWZTvB-U
If you would like to receive email updates re new FOI responses, let me know at christinem@fluoridefreepeel.ca or cmssyc@gmail.com or sign up for my free Substack newsletter: https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/.
The fascinating new documentary series, The Viral Delusion from Hollywood filmmaker Mike Wallach, is free for a limited time and features the growing group of doctors and scientists dismantling the illusion of virus theory to understand the real causes of disease – from The Great Plague to Polio, AIDS to COVID.
You can now see Episode One for free, by clicking HERE
“Absolutely incredible and incredibly important” – Dr. Sam Bailey. “Immensely important and beautifully made” Dr. John Bevin-Smith. “Amazing. Should be translated into every language in the world” – Dr. Vinnie Costa.
Anyone can understand the problems with virology, this is not rocket science. However, for the record in case anyone wants to know, my degrees are shown below.
Honours BA from University of Toronto, June 11 2007 (I did a specialist in sociology and a major in statistics):
And below is my masters degree in biostatistics, from the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, November 13, 2008:
Musical fluoride fight production coming to BrainerdBRAINERD — Dancing teeth and singing dentists, coming soon to a stage near you. Well, in 2025, that is, if you’re in Brainerd. Stage North Theatre Company is set to stage a musical comedy about Brainerd’s fight against state-mandated water fluoridation in the 1960s, ‘70s and ‘80s. Director Gary Hirsch and playwright Roger Nieboer are […]
The CDC has no scientific evidence of any “Dengue virus”
August 30, 2023: CDC confessed they have no studies that scientifically prove / provide evidence of the existence of the alleged Dengue virus… or even records of the alleged “virus” being found in and purified from bodily fluid/tissue/excrement (confirmed via EM)… by anyone, anywhere, ever. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/CDC-dengue-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
The CDC has no scientific evidence showing that Acinetobacter baumannii can be deadly or cause any adverse health effect.
September 12, 2023: Roger Andoh, acting as FOIA Officer in the Office of the Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, confessed that these institutions have no records of controlled experiments using pure cultures to support their claim that Acinetobacter baumannii causes any adverse health effect. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CDC-Acinetobacter-baumannii-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
The CDC has no scientific evidence showing that bacteria cause “Lyme Disease”
Another year, another war. Stefano Scoglio on the nonexistence of graphene. But is it journalism? Introduction to ‘rapo’.
Listen now (4 hrs) | Thank you to our many new paying subscribers who signed on overnight. Thanks for joining me, wherever you may be in the world, in the future, or in your state of mind. Dear Friend and Listener: Planet Waves FM returns to the airwaves tonight with a new program covering four essential issues. In the f…
3000 pages of “virus” FOIs (updated as of December 31, 2022) in 8 compilation pdfs, and my notarized declaration re the anti-scientific nature of virology: https://tinyurl.com/IsolationFOIs
I have seen this argument being made by some prominent people within the health freedom community that there is no need to debate the existence of “viruses” at this moment in time. After witnessing the incredible power of what the fear of an invisible boogeyman can bring about with the destructive lockdowns, quarantines, social distancing, mass testing, forced business closures, travel restrictions, mask and vaccine mandates, etc., these people are of the belief that there is no reason to argue against the existence of this dangerous weapon that was effectively used against us. They believe that we are winning by arguing within the germ theory pharmaceutical paradigm and that the time is not right to change course in order to bring this fraudulent house of cards crashing down. They believe that this debate will not ultimately lead to solutions that will ensure that this “viral” madness never happens again.
When asked why they are unwilling to touch upon this subject, some, like Robert Kennedy Jr., will state that questioning the existence of “viruses” is above their expertise level, as he admitted to investigative journalist Eric Coppolino in April 2022:
“Yeah, I really am not qualified to comment but I…my inclination if there are people who say the viruses don’t exist that there is no virus… I don’t, you know, my inclination is that, um, that simply is not, you know, that’s not true.”
“And I am kind of amused reading the exchanges and my inclination is that the viruses do exist and they do make people sick. I could be wrong. It could all be a big hoax, but to me, it all seems like, you know, viruses are real, and um so, look, I should have just shut up from the beginning and say I’m not gonna answer that question.”
“Again, I am not a good a good per— I am not a scientist. I don’t pretend to be. I find those arguments interesting.”
In his response, RFK Jr. determined that he is not qualified to speak to the existence of “viruses” as he is not a scientist. However, he has concluded, apparently without investigating the matter, that the scientists are right about the existence of these entities. This is despite the fact that, even though Kennedy Jr. says he is not a scientist, he claims an expertise in reading scientific papers and spotting “junk science:”
Q: Do you have scientific training?
A: No. My background is I’m an environmental lawyer. I’m not a scientist. But I have an expertise, I would say, in reading science and spotting junk science because that’s what I do with most of my time.
Kennedy Jr. has said that he is very accustomed to reading science, and that he knows how to read science critically:
“I’m very accustomed to reading science. I’ve brought over 500 successful lawsuits, almost all of them involve scientific controversy. I know how to read science, and I know how to read it critically.”
If it were truly the case that Kennedy Jr. can read science critically and that he is an expert at weeding out junk science, it is hard to see how he can continue to promote junk science as if it were real science with his fear propaganda headlines claiming that “SARS-COV-2” is a bioweapon that was engineered during gain of function experiments in Wuhan. It’s difficult to see how he had enough expertise to read gain of function studies and yet, miss the junk science within them, in order to write an entire book about the existence of a “virus” when he admits to being unqualified to speak on the subject of the existence of “viruses” in the first place.
When Kennedy Jr.’s Children Health Defense was asked by Christine Massey about this unwillingness to examine the lack of scientific evidence supporting virology, Mary Holland, CHD’s president, anonymously quoted their science advisor, Jay Couey, who said it lacked nuance and was not a viable position:
“While we agree that there have been many, many lies during covid, we believe that the situation is complicated, and that the ‘no virus’ stance lacks sufficient nuance to be the most viable position.”
The sentiment that attacking virology is not a viable strategy has been echoed by other prominent health freedom activists, such as Del Bigtree, as well. In a September 2022 interview with Derrick Broze, Del stated that the time was not right to change the game. In fact, he said we were winning by playing their game. If he was to discuss terrain theory and virology, he would need to leave the stadium filled with spectators while winning. He would need to go to a different stadium and build a different team and establish new rules. Thus, Bigtree concluded that he can not leave in the middle of the game. In other words, he must continue going on promoting “viruses” and gain of function narratives in order to keep on “winning” within the pharmaceutical playbook.
Del prefaced his odd sports analogy by stating that he was raised to believe that disease came from the mind. He didn’t even go to doctors until he was an adult. His mother would allow any fevers to run their course without interference. However, Del did not address his beliefs or his background on The Doctors as he was enamored by the medical ideas and advancements he was promoting on his show. Through his interviews with scientists and virologists, he came to the realization that they do not know their own “science” and that their beliefs are akin to indoctrination. He believes that they have no understanding of the “immune system,” bacteria, and “viruses.” They assume that the science has been done when, in fact, this is not the case. Thus, Del feels that many base their germ theory assumptions upon the teachings that they received at the pharmaceutically-funded universities.
It is very frustrating as much of what Del speaks to rings true. He seems to understand the issues with germ theory and seemingly subscribed to terrain for most of his life. He believes that terrain theory needs funding in order to be further explored. However, he has some fundamental misunderstandings and differences as well. Del seems to believe that terrain theory teaches that “viruses” are created within the body when the environmental conditions require them in order for a cleansing to occur. However, there is no place for “viruses” within terrain theory. Del also offered that he disagreed that these microorganisms are only found within us, stating that they can invade our bodies from the outside. He felt that if one keeps their terrain clean, “viruses” and bacteria can not make one sick.
Thus, Del has mixed both germ theory and terrain theory together, which is something that I have recently seen from interviewer Derrick Broze and others as well. There is this middle ground that they are trying to play, almost as if they are afraid to upset the apple cart. Broze even cut Del off during the interview in order to interject that germ theory and terrain theory are not mutually exclusive, i.e. cannot occur simultaneously, and that they can coexist at the same time. He even made such a comment recently to users on Twitter where he stated that pathogens and terrain are not in conflict.
Thus, it is with this information in mind that I engaged in a Twitter exchange with Derrick Broze in an attempt to gain some clarity, not only on his position, but also as to why the “no virus” issue is not at the top of the playbook in terms of bringing about the winning play in order to ensure the final outcome of the game is in our favor. It wasn’t a very long exchange, but it was rather informative, which is why I want to share it with you here. I also want to make the case to Broze, Bigtree, and Kennedy Jr. as to why we can not win this game until we stop playing by their rules. When the game is rigged, the only thing left to do is to change the game.
I want to be clear that this is not meant as an attack on Broze, or even Kennedy Jr., Bigtree, and others who share this belief that striking at the very foundations of germ theory and virology is not beneficial. This is an attempt to reconcile a fundamental sticking point that has driven a wedge within the health freedom community. I am focusing mostly on Derrick Broze here due to my exchange with him as well as a recent interview that he conducted with James Corbett. During this interview (at about the 20 minute mark), Broze asked a question to Corbett that he stated the “rabid” audience wanted him to ask. This is the “virus” question…which was never really addressed as Broze immediately shrugged off any discussion about the (lack of) scientific evidence and decided to, instead, focus on the so-called “rabid no virus” community. He wanted to talk about the “you are either with us, or against us” mentality that he said he has seen that leads to himself and others being labelled as controlled-opposition (CO). It was insinuated by Corbett that this approach, of labeling people like himself and Broze as CO based upon a single issue, is a part of a CIA plan to discredit them. Broze seemed to agree that, even though he did not have evidence of this being true, the “no virus” crowd may be an attempt to infiltrate and blow up the health freedom community.
Broze then decided to represent the “no virus” side in the interview by stating that we believe that addressing this issue will bring the whole house of cards tumbling down. However, he immediately stated that he did not agree with this position, thus throwing any unbiased objectivity out the door from his role-playing. Broze followed this up by claiming that communism, climate change, and alien invasions will be used against us even if we bring virology and germ theory down. He argued that those in control do not need the “plandemic” card if they can jump to something else. While there is truth to Broze’s statement, this does not mean that we shouldn’t focus on taking away the “plandemic” card from their arsenal of weapons so that they are incapable of using it against us again in the future. They already have the infrastructure in place to easily play this card whenever they desire in order to bring about further restrictions and control. Of Broze’s list of potential scenarios, the “plandemic” card is by far the easiest and most viable option to be used against us in the near future.
As
Christine Massey’s “germ” FOI Newsletteralso provided an excellent breakdown and commentary that focused on further problems with Broze and Corbett’s discussion on the “no virus” issue, I wanted to share her analysis here as well:
Derrick Broze and James Corbett talk about how uncool it is for no-virus people to accuse yes-virus people of being controlled op (as if all no-virus people do this, and no yes-virus people do this)… and in the same breath speculate about no-virus people being cognitive infiltrators and “part of a plan” (as in “controlled op”) lol.
Next Derek misrepresents no-virus people as naively thinking/claiming that getting the world to understand the no-virus reality will magically solve all problems. I don’t know anyone who thinks or claims that. It would be a lot more useful if Derek interviewed some no-virus people instead of speculating and putting words in our mouths.
Next James asks Derek to stand in and speak for no-virus people (!!) and answer the question as to whether or not governments would have the right to violate people’s bodily autonomy IF there really was a contagious health threat. Derek says “no” (so does everyone else that I know). But then James ironically goes on an almost-hysterical rant saying that anyone who answers “yes” is NOT part of the health freedom movement and is missing the whole point. It’s almost as if he’s trying to cause division over people’s hypothetical answers to a hypothetical question.
James also claims that answering “no” to this hypothetical question is more important than addressing the real-world issue of whether or not we’ve been lied to all our lives about “viruses”. What was the purpose of all this in the middle of a discussion about no-virus people, I wonder?
James also makes reference to some people not believing in bacterial infections. He seems not to realize that people are actually pointing out the lack of science showing that bacteria are the CAUSE of disease. He wouldn’t have this misconception if he had just spoken to some well-known no-virus people instead of speculating about them. Meanwhile Derek keeps nodding and looking into the camera as if to say “those ridiculous no-virus people”.
Next James claims that germ theory and terrain theory go together! And talks about how a healthy immune system will protect you from pathogens. Maybe someone will ask him to share the successful, valid germ theory controlled experiments that progressed a germ hypothesis to the theory stage.
Then Derek shared his “feeling” that there could be other reasons for the hundreds of failures by institutions in 40 countries to provide even 1 record of “SARS-COV-2” being purified from any alleged host (which would only be the 1st step necessary to show the existence of a “virus”). He speculates that maybe institutions really do have responsive records. Hmm, well if Derek knows of any such record, for any “virus” in the history of virology, I do hope he will share it with the rest of the world post haste.
Then James makes a ridiculous comment about how he supposedly filed a FOIA with the government for “isolated terrain” and got no records – which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever since terrain isn’t a specific particle/thing that can be isolated/purified. He then quips that therefore “terrain theory doesn’t exist”, as if this shows that the hundreds of FOIs responses about imaginary viruses (which are alleged to be specific particles in “hosts”) are actually irrelevant and useless. Derek nods smugly and laughs.
Are Derek and James really so clued out that they don’t realize that the FOI responses align with what is seen in the published literature, and simply confirm what could already be seen?
There is a further problem with conversations such as this exchange between Broze and Corbett as well as the earlier example from Broze’s interview with Del Bigtree. According to his biography, Derrick Broze considers himself an investigative journalist:
“Derrick Broze is a freelance investigative journalist, activist, author, public speaker, and current candidate for Mayor of Houston. For the last ten years, Derrick has been active in Houston as a journalist and activist seeking to expose local corruption and give a voice to ignored Houstonians. As a candidate for Mayor, he is focusing on issues, which affect all Houstonians yet are ignored by local press and politicians.”
Journalists are supposed to side with none of the parties involved, and only provide the relevant facts and information. This is how they keep their reporting unbiased. However, Broze regularly intercedes by incorporating his own opinions into his questions and then tends to guide the conversation with leading questions. He is not presenting an unbiased look at the “no virus” position to his viewers. He is flavoring it with his own opinion and interpretations that were seemingly gathered from a few conversations he had with Drs. Andrew Kaufman and Tom Cowan, as well as authors Dawn Lester and David Parker. While Broze says that the “no virus” position raises interesting questions and points, he seems disinterested in truly exploring them and has mostly written the position off as a “rabid” base that he must appease by occasionally asking questions and misrepresenting our position to his guests.
If he is going to ask questions about the “no virus” position and attempt to represent our side fairly, Derrick has a responsibility as an investigative journalist to fully research the topic in order to present it accurately to his guests and his viewers. He should do so without coloring our position with his own opinions, especially as to a “rabid” social media base or the idea of a CIA psy-op bent on infiltration. If he is not clear about our position, there are many other great people to learn from including Dr. Stefan Lanka, Drs. Sam and Mark Bailey, Dr. Jordan Grant, Dr. Amandha Vollmer, Dr. Kevin Corbett, etc. All he has to do is ask and we will be more than happy to enlighten him further.
Derrick stated in his interview with Corbett that this is not about censoring the “no virus” position. While it is true that he is not outright censoring us, Broze doesn’t seem to want to include our position as a part of the conversation going forward in regard to bringing about lasting solutions and change. This, in turn, is keeping people away from an important discussion that will help to free them from the medical cartel. Broze’s reluctance to discuss this topic was evidenced by exchanges with Alec Zeck about a recent event that they both participated in. While I was not involved in this event in any way, I will do my best to summarize the situation as accurately as possible based upon what I know.
In a January 2023 event called “The Greater Reset,” Alec was invited as a speaker. Doing what he does best, Alec brilliantly provided the case for why germ theory and virology are pseudoscience during his presentation in order to help dispel the fear of pathogenic entities. This apparently was not to the liking of Derrick and others leading the event. This was pointed out by Alec in a recent tweet that Derrick responded to, stating that the “no virus” topic was not to be included in the event as it does not offer practical solutions that help us to escape the slavery system.
It really surprised me that Derrick is under the impression that exposing the germ theory fraud and unshackling the masses from the grips of the pharmaceutical cartel does not offer a practical solution to help us escape the slavery system. This response didn’t sit well with me nor with Alec. He pressed Broze about the inclusion of Del Bigtree, asking what solutions he offered during the event. Alec also challenged Derrick on why the “no virus” conversation is not a part of the solution. This was something that I wanted further clarity on as well.
Derrick shared a private message from Telegram between himself and Alec explaining that, while Del had no solutions to offer, he was there to “pump up the crowd.” Alec challenged Derrick to show how his own presentation helping others to let go of the fear of germ theory is not solution oriented. Sadly, that thread went silent.
In a separate exchange related to the Bigtree topic, Derrick answered another user, Greg Shantz, regarding the lack of a solution offered by Del. Broze doubled down on his hypocritical explanation of including Del, a speaker without solutions who was there to “pump up the crowd,” while disparaging Alec, a speaker who actually provided a solution with his presentation.
While I am not certain what Del spoke about at the event, I jumped in with my own thoughts on how Del regularly “pumps up the crowd” with talk about bioweapons, gain of function myths, “safe” vaccines, and the existence of invisible boogeymen. In my opinion, based upon what I have seen, Del promotes fear. This, to me, is not a practical solution. Broze argued that Del spoke about none of those things at the event and that we, on the “no virus” side, are too narrow in our focus on germ theory and virology. However, I was focused on the content Del regularly ptoduces on The Highwire and that his message is aimed at promoting fear when discussing those topics to his viewers as the truth. We can promote solutions without repeating the pharmaceutical propaganda.
While I understand that there are other important issues to address that go beyond germ theory and virology, I fail to see how this topic should not be at the forefront when looking for solutions, especially factoring in all that we have endured over the past three years. Derrick did not seem to like my question probing him as to why this topic was not a part of the solution. He brushed it off, telling me to do my thing and that he will do his. When I clarified that he was not providing a direct response, he implied that my asking for one was reflecting my attitude of entitlement. It’s an odd position to take for someone who regularly interviews others.
In a separate conversation with another user, I pointed out that no one was trying to force Derrick into any position. My intent was simply to understand why he felt that discussing the lack of scientific evidence for germ theory/virology was not a solution. If we expose this centuries old lie, we can bring down the pharmaceutical-industrial complex built upon it. Derrick jumped in and once again painted our side as “rabid” (ironic) and that the discussion was not essential. It seemed to me that he was judging our position based upon Twitter comments and social media interactions. However, Derrick clarified that he based his views on his interactions with Dr. Cowan, Dr. Kaufman, as well as Dawn Lester and David Parker. It is a truly great line-up representing our position, so I am at a loss as to how Derrick still seems unclear about our argument.
Regardless, Derrick seems intent on painting our side as “rabid” and “entitled” due to the fact that we want our position at the table when it comes to speaking about solutions. I do not consider our base “rabid.” I consider them passionate about spreading the truth of the matter, which is that there is no scientific evidence supporting germ theory and virology. If he has any misunderstandings about our position, all he has to do is ask.
Derrick said that he does not jump on bandwagons and that he takes the time to research a topic before forming an opinion. However, based upon what I have seen, it does not seem that he has truly researched this topic as he is still not clear as to what our position is. Instead, he has decided that the “no virus” issue is not crucial to bringing about lasting change. While he claims that we have interesting questions and valid points, he is disinterested in pursuing them. He has somehow come to the conclusion that both terrain theory and germ theory can work together.
Thus, I want to know what research Derrick has done on this topic outside of his four interviews. What information did he see that left him unconvinced about our position? Did he read any of the foundational virology papers looking to see if they actually contained evidence derived from the scientific method? What contagion experiments convinced him that germ theory has any validity whatsoever? Did he read about the failed human-to-human transmissions experiments conducted by Milton Rosenau in 1918 during the height of Spanish flu, considered the most infectious and deadly “virus” of all time? How much of the history of germ theory did he investigate? Did he take the time to read Robert Koch’s experiments with bacteria and his failures to satisfy his own logical postulates? Did he look into Louis Pasteur’s unethical and fraudulent rabies experiments that were exposed by Pasteur’s own notebooks? Did he read John Franklin Enders 1954 measles paper that established as well as disproved the cell culture process that is still used to “isolate viruses” today? What scientific evidence convinced Derrick that there is any truth in germ theory and virology at all and that they can coexist with terrain theory?
These are not just questions that I would like Derrick to answer, but also Robert Kennedy Jr., Del Bigtree, and anyone else within the health freedom community who continues to promote the existence of pathogenic “viruses” and bacteria. If anyone in the health freedom community is going to parrot the mainstream narrative that these entities are pathogens capable of bringing about and spreading disease, as well as that they can be engineered into dangerous bioweapons, they must show us the evidence derived from the scientific method that supports this belief, just as we ask any virologist, microbiologist, scientist, doctor, etc. to do as well. Please share the necessary scientific evidence that should be included in any foundational paper claiming the existence of any “virus” with us if you remain unconvinced.
If you can not provide this evidence, ask yourself why it does not exist. Ask yourself how germ theory and virology were scientifically validated without adherence to the scientific method. What you will see is that the evidence supporting germ theory and virology that has been piling up for centuries is, in fact, by definition, pseudoscience. Once you realize that our pharmaceutical-industrial complex was built on top of pseudoscientific fraud, you will see that exposing this lie to the masses ends this corrupt system. There will be no more ability for those in control to use the fear of the pathogenic entity in order to bring about destructive lockdowns, quarantines, social distancing, mass testing, forced business closures, travel restrictions, mask and vaccine mandates, etc. Once people realize that they were knowingly lied to for over two centuries about the nature of health and wellness, they will start to examine what other areas they were lied to about as well. Exposing the germ theory lie has the potential to bring about a domino effect of realization that, if we were lied to about the “science” of “viruses,” we may have also been lied to about the “science” of other topics such as climate change.
Thus, exposing the fraud of germ theory is vitally important. It has the potential to bring about real and lasting change. It can cascade into other areas while saving many lives in the process. This topic must be at the forefront of any discussions involving solutions. This is not to say that the other topics are not important. It is to say that exposing germ theory may very well be the most pressing one that has the most potential for an immediate impact.
Continuing to play within the germ theory playbook, discussing gain of function, bioweapons, PCR fraud, the ineffectiveness of the restrictive measures enacted, the need for “safer” vaccines, etc. will ultimately get us nowhere. Going down this road continues to promote the lie and takes us further away from the truth. If those within the health freedom community continue to promote pathogens, knowing full well that the scientific evidence does not exist, in order to try and “win” the game, they are no better than the people and organizations they rally against that also promote these same lies. We will not win by playing their game and hiding the truth. In order to really win, we must expose the lies and the corruption. We must blow up the game board and change the playbook. It is far past time to bring this discussion to the table. Failing to do so at this moment in time is an incredible blunder, i.e. a stupid and careless mistake.
Update 6/21/23:
Since this article came out, a few things have happened which I feel are important to update here. On June 19th, Derrick posted a walkabout video where he touched on his recent Corbett interview and his frustration with the “no virus” crowd. In this short video, Derrick broke the camp into 3 groups. Those who believe:
“Covid” has not been isolated.
“Covid” does not exist.
“Viruses” do not exist and terrain theory is correct.
Broze stated that he tends to agree with the first group in that “Covid” (I’m assuming he means “SARS-COV-2” as “Covid” is the disease, not the “virus”) has not been isolated. He stated that this debate about “viruses” has been going on for three years, which is misleading as there have been many who have challenged germ theory and the existence of “viruses” ever since these concepts were introduced. The most prominent period occured with those who challenged the HIV/AIDS narrative in the 1980s and throughout the proceeding decades. The “SARS-COV-2/Covid” debate has been an extension of this. Terrain theory itself has been around since the mid 1800’s to challenge Louis Pasteur’s germ theory due to the work of Claude Bernard and Antoine Bechamp. In other words, this is not a new debate.
Derrick discussed his early conversations on this subject with Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Tom Cowan, and stated that he was unsure if they were real doctors. This was rather shocking to hear from an investigative journalist who had previously interviewed both men. This confusion is easily rectified by a quick search where one can find out that both men are, in fact, doctors.
Derrick stated that, throughout this “pandemic,” he has been giving a voice to the “no virus” crowd even though he is not fully convinced of our conclusions. Thus, I would again like to ask Derrick what he remains unconvinced and/or skeptical about? Myself and others are more than happy to clear up any questions he may have. Derrick stated that he has asked many prominent people including Del Bigtree, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Joseph Mercola, and Catherine Austin Fitts about the “no virus” position and whether:
It is a distraction.
It is meant to divide and conquer.
It is true, but that it is not a good time to talk about it.
Again, these are leading questions that do not do our position any justice. The first two paint our position in a entirely negative light, while the third is absurd in that, if they agreed that our position is true, why would there be no reason to discuss it? The truth should never be sidelined. The time to discuss the truth is now rather than when it is convenient.
Derrick touched on Christine Massey’s excellent FOI requests and presented the case for why he felt they might not matter if they are worded wrong and/or sent to the wrong institutions. However, Derrick did say that they are intriguing, even though he personally is not sure, even if they are true (they are), that the information from these FOI’s should lead one to believe that “Covid” (again, I assume he means “SARS-COV-2”) does not exist. I’m not sure how Derrick comes to the conclusion that one should still believe in the “virus” even when the very institutions claiming the existence of the “virus” admit to not having the necessary evidence showing the existence of the “virus,” so it would be great if Derrick would clarify what he means. At about the 10 minute and 40 second mark, Derrick does mention me by name due to this article. He stated that he was not calling me out or trying to start a feud. I want to be clear that my intention was never to start a feud. My interest is mainly to clear up some fundamental sticking points that I feel really need to be addressed.
Derrick stated that he will continue to ask prominent people about the “no virus” issue, which I applaud. I truly hope that he does. However, I also hope that Derrick takes to heart some of the constructive criticism laid out here. Derrick says that he is continuing to research and that he has a video coming out soon about the “Rosenbaum” papers on contagion (I believe he is referring to the Rosenau Spanish flu experiments linked within this article) and that he still has questions after reading these papers. I would love to help address any questions Derrick may have.
On June 20th, I had another brief exchange with Derrick on Christine Massey’s Facebook post about this article. It was a pleasant enough exchange which I am presenting here:
I did send Derrick an email as he requested if he wishes to continue this discussion. Hopefully, we can build on this going forward and clear up any sticking points along the way.
The Truth Seeker wrote an excellent piece back in March addressing many of the misconceptions that Broze and others have about the “no virus” issue.
After two or three months of frustrated looking, I finally traced the inspiration behind our failed schooling—and the bizarre sexualization of elementary school children along with the intellectual degradation of subject matter to its likely historic origins.
A discovery I am eager to share with you—with this admonitory warning: the trail I followed goes through such complicated intellectual terrain that to expound upon it comprehensively would require a full-length, scholarly book to recover all its nuances and interconnections, work I lack the physical strength to perform for the moment, in my paralyzed state.
But even a sketchy account, such as I am about to give you, will reduce the stressful pressure of asking who? For what reason? And how?
Shortly after the Russian revolution had succeeded, Lenin called a secret meeting in Moscow in 1922 of leading leftists to discuss a way to further Marxist/Communist interests internationally by undermining the cultural strength of targeted countries.
From this meeting the decision emerged to locate a forge of international trouble-makers at the University of Frankfurt in northern Germany, which became known as “The Frankfurt School”. Its guiding strategy was to organize intellectuals to cause de-moralizing acts of mischief which tended to attack the particular cultural pride of target nations.
The campaign against America, for example, was to encourage mass immigration in order to dilute national identity, to stimulate and exacerbate racial arguments, to attack, through law and media propaganda, any distinction between the genders, and to prematurely awaken lustful sexual appetites among young children by introducing pornography into school curricula , in hopes this would:
1) seduce the young away from intellectual concentration
2) to divide the young from their parents’ values, and
3) to spread moral confusion through the culture, discrediting authority as
“old-fashioned” (if in matters of sex, then possibly everywhere else too!)
4) to challenge Christian teaching.
Hitler’s government expelled the Frankfurt conspirators from Germany in the 1920s. Its personnel and seditious agenda left Frankfurt and resettled wholesale in New York City subsidized by the Rockefeller Foundation where its professors resumed employment at Columbia University where it proselytized left-leaning colleagues there and throughout the “Ivy League,” one of whom, George S. Counts threw down the Frankfurt gauntlet in 1932 with a prophetic book, Dare the Schools Build a New Social Order. It’s answer…yes!! The Frankfurt projects next attempted (successfully) were named by journalists, “The Sexual Revolution” and “Women’s Lib”.
The structure of our bad schools pretending to be education comes to us, as you know, from Germany and from the hands of some world-famous philosophers responding to demands of politicians for a way to make the subject-citizenry reliably obedient.
The solution adopted was to force the children of oncoming generations into isolated confinement with loyal political employees, loyal to the political leader, to be taught collective habits and to lose the ability to criticize and rebel—to be schooled like fish, instead of educated to think independently.
Germany at the time, in the first quarter of the 19th century, was tending toward a system of governance known as socialism, (or under influence of another German thinker, Karl Marx, communism), a scheme to invent an entirely new system of governance, based on ideas from the culture of finance, which pitted social classes against one another and led, ultimately, to dominance of the laboring classes. Communist theory, as taught in Marx’s magnum opus, Das Kapital, led to a ringing rhetorical call to revolt, “The Communist Manifesto,” which became the banner of many violent insurrections against authority which rocked Europe in the year, 1848, signaling an enormous revolution in Russia at century’s end ultimately establishing a communist dictatorship, the Soviet Union. This alarmed traditional governors worldwide, fearful of a similar transformation of their own citizenries. Marx’s ideas had enormous influence on public thinking everywhere. This type of thinking eventually transformed schooling in
America quite radically, leading to a collapse in what economist, Adam Smith, called “educational schooling,” in his capitalist classic, Wealth of Nations. Their strategies hurt personalized learning as collective institutions (“schools”) attempted to deliver individual intellectual training of a caliber equivalent to that expected by private academies for the children of the prosperous classes.
The great movement to dumb-down the fare of common schools originated with a bizarre group of very radical German intellectuals in the city of Frankfurt, home of the world’s original fast food, “the frankfurter” or hot dog (so called because through the 1920s it was often made with dog meat).
This group of college professors was dedicated to discovering ways to cause social change of a profound sort—revolution. Whether against governments of left or right was a matter of indifference to them. The efficient engineering of change was all that mattered to them.
Among the first principles they developed was that two institutions – the church and the family– stood in the way of social change and would have to be destroyed, or weakened. This alone was enough to make the Frankfurt School unpopular and unwelcome among traditional governors.
A simple answer to a lumpen question:
TAKE YOUR CHILDREN OUTTA SCHOOLS NOW!!! THOSE AREN’T ANYTHING BESIDES INDOCTRINATION LABS,,, AND UNFORTUNATELY THESE LABS HAVE YOUR CHILDREN TO PERFORM TEST UPON!!!
