Thank you brother Anders! NAZI SS CIA REINHARD GEHLEN – MEMBER OF THE OCTOGON GROUP – OCCULT KNIGHTS TEMPLARS FROM HELL -> KNIGHTS OF MALTA & VATICAN… – đĽ The Entire History On ‘The Jesuit Order’ & The Plans Of World Domination Full Documentary —Âť> https://rumble.com/v23hic8-the-entire-history-o⌠– đĽ The Black Nobility Jesuit Order: Founders of… Continue reading Save, Share & Spread before they’re gone…
You can never reach the word of ‘Kun’ as one of my brilliant teachers and ex-companion said… So get lost you muzzled dog and may God’s wrath reach you uninformed,,, Ameen! -A.
âPaves way for targeted therapiesâ. Anyone believing conventional science and medicine, after the past four plus years, is doing anything of this ilk for our benefit, needs to re examine their cognitive thinking skills.
Believe, however, in the âtargetedâ part of that declaration..
ExcerptâŚScientists studying the brain often rely on publicly available catalogs of genes and gene transcripts. However, human brain tissue, particularly embryonic tissue, is difficult to access, restricting the comprehensiveness of these datasets. For this study, the researchers obtained six developing human neocortex tissue samples representing the mid-gestation period, or 15 to 17 weeks post-conception. This developmental time point in the human brain is a critical window during which the complexity of our brain â the most sophisticated organ in our body â begins to emerge.
You can expect what madness is coming with new ‘G’. Get lost you muzzled dog and all the criminals with their partners and associates in crime! -A
ExcerptâŚEricsson and Telcaria have joined forces to improve the energy efficiency of 5G networks as part of the â6G DAWNâ project overseen by CTTC and funded under Spainâs government initiatives. Focused on optimizing private 5G networks for reduced energy consumption without compromising performance, the partnership adopts a public-private integrated network approach. Through advanced technologies like Network Digital Twin and Network Exposure deployed in the 5TONIC lab, the collaboration aims to validate these enhancements in a live environment. By leveraging the energy-efficient nature of 5G technology and exploring innovative solutions, the collaboration seeks to drive sustainability and cost savings for businesses across various sectors.
.and you thought peeing in a pool was rude… Believe it or not, this actually isnât Bill Gates idea, but I agree, it sure does sound like it. In my first article of this series we discussed how Cloud Seeding is Toxic AF and looked at a list of ingredients that are being sprayed into… Continue reading Spray the Sky with Piss đ˝ New Chemtrail Patent âď¸ (Yes, Seriously)
We are now over four years into the COVID-19 fraud and while many things have changed, confusion remains the dominant theme. More people are coming to the realisation that there was no pandemic but there are also plenty of people ramping up âbioweaponsâ and âgain of functionâ narratives. Amongst this we have also seen the introduction of a new side-stepping argument that, âvirus existence is not importantâ.
In 2020, we started investigating the virus model and came to the realisation that SARS-CoV-2 did not exist. In fact, there was no scientific evidence that any viruses existed, dating back to the late 1800s literature and the so-called Tobacco Mosaic âVirusâ. Those critiquing virology have pointed out that no entity that meets the description of a virus has ever been physically isolated. In order to maintain the illusion, the virologists have not performed properly controlled experiments such as those proposed in the âSettling the Virus Debateâ Statement. Indeed, Dr Stefan Lanka had shown that various indirect findings claimed as evidence for viruses are produced by the experimental methodologies themselves.
In 2022, Mark published A Farewell to Virology (Expert Edition), a formal refutation of almost every aspect of the virus model. As with other works that âno virusâ proponents have produced there has been no direct response to the overall thesis. Instead we have only seen attempts to change the subject, cloud the established definitions of words or introduce new unfalsifiable hypotheses. There is no âthird wayâ when it comes to virus existence and this sophistry only distracts from the fact that no âpathogensâ of any type have been shown to exist. The real world human and animal experiments that set out to demonstrate âcontagiousâ entities that cause diseases such as influenza and common colds were monumental flops.
In this video we investigate why realising that viruses do not exist is a pivotal step for reducing fear and creating a better society.
In our book Virus Mania, we called Chapter 7: âH5N1: Avian Flu and Not a Glimmer of Proofâ and exposed the foundational fraud behind the attempts to convince the public that there was a deadly new influenza âvirusâ. We suspected the narrative would be used again which is why we featured it on the cover of the 2021 edition. Sure enough, in 2023 the âbird fluâ was being used once more as the excuse to carry out the mass culling of poultry as I covered that year in âTaking Away Your Chickensâ.
In recent weeks, the public âhealthâ agencies and mainstream media have been featuring âH5N1â in the headlines and âmessagingâ to the public that a pandemic could be about to start. As expected, some of the alleged experts have started flapping their wings about âpandemic preparednessâ plans. There is also an additional angle in that they are claiming to find the influenza âvirusâ in milk which appears to be a new weapon in the war against raw milk and unpasteurised products.
By a stroke of luck, or more precisely through bureaucratic bungling, private researcher and biostatistician Christine Massey received a surprise invitation to an online H5N1 roundtable meeting headed by Theresa Tam, the Chief Public Health Officer of Canada. This enabled us to secure exclusive footage of how they are rolling out the surveillance program and the virological pseudoscience that underpins the entire fraud. You will need to watch the video to fully appreciate the absurd level of nonsense coming from some of the key enablers in this brewing swindleâŚ
The FDA and EPA absolutely assure us “Cloud Seeding is just Silver Iodide! It’s just to make rain! It’s totally safe!”. Today we are going to find out if that’s true…
âTheyâre just cloud seeding, itâs not chemtrails! Itâs harmless!â, they tell us. In fact, it’s so harmless that the vast majority of states in the US have some form of seeding program currently taking place. Many of them are funded with our tax dollars, but some are sponsored by corporations you would never expect to be involved in GeoEngineering. Idaho Power currently spends $4 million a year on cloud seeding which results in a 12% increase in snow in some areas.
Although the internet assures us Cloud Seeding is super-duper safe, today we are going to look at what chemicals are being spammed into the atmosphere, according to the Manufacturers of the chemicals and a crazy CDC document I unearthed.
WHAT IS CLOUD SEEDING?
Cloud Seeding involves chemicals being sprayed into the atmosphere to hopefully make precipitation:
I said hopefully make precipitation because two consecutive days of spraying chemicals to seed clouds only results in a 67% chance of rain. Or perhaps we should say, âTwo days of spraying results in a 33% failure rateâ, meaning 1 out of every 3 chemical-spray operations doesnât bring rain, so environmentally damaging toxins were released into the atmosphere for absolutely nothing.
To seed, planes are loaded with flares:
They then burn them in the sky:
Or flares can be shot from the ground:
As stated in decades of US military and government documents, Seeding not only makes rain but also make fog, snow or hail, because you know, sometimes people really need more snow, so itâs good to have the capabilityâŚ.
MAKING HAIL
GeoEngineered hail is no longer the cute little pieces of ice that delicately tink⌠tink⌠tink on your roof. It has gotten so out of control that across the world people are seeing this insanity:
âIce Pellet” Hail from Cloud Seeding: Round balls that appear to be made in a factory:
GeoEngineering IS a direct cause of weather chaos.
The worst part is, their cloud seeding chemicals and weather-altering operations result in insurance claims being driven up which results in you and I having to bear the burden of higher rates across the board for home and auto.
The GeoEngineered hail has gotten so bad that now they are now using GeoEngineering Countermeasures to fight the GeoEngineered hail. Meet the Hail Cannon: (37 second video)
Hail Cannons are used to reverse GeoEngineering by sending MASSIVEshockwaves into the atmosphere to try and stop the Cloud-Seeded-Hail before it causes extreme damage to properties, car dealership inventory and crops. Hereâs one in action. It is so loud that it is shaking the ground. Iâm sure this is simply fantastic for nature: (38 second video)
Not all Seeding is for precipitation. Seeding is also used to block the sun.
Raytheon’s âAtmospheric Seedingâ with Metallic Particles Patent
Here is taped testimony involving Julio Gomez, attorney for the Los Alamos Study Group and Justin Price, a Rhode Island State Representative, regarding Raytheonâs patent for âSeedingâ with Aluminum. (25 second video)
Iâm going to write an article just on that document soon, so hop on the Truth Train, I saved you a seat:
As you can see, we havenât even gotten into the actual Seeding ingredients and itâs already a disaster. Sky-chemicals, fog, hail busting out windshields, shockwave cannons, Raytheon metal-sky patents, controlling the sun; what a nightmare they have caused trying to play God⌠then they call it âClimate Changeâ and blame us for using an air conditioner during the summer or drinking through a plastic strawâŚ
With that being said, letâs rip off the Band-Aid and look at what is actually in Cloud Seeding:
MK BALLISTICS
There was a company called MK BALLISTICS. As you can guess by their name, they made ballistics⌠and also Cloud Seeding Flares. Yes, they produced weapons of war and seeding supplies because itâs the same ingredients.
In 2004, MK Ballistics was investigated by the CDC for their chemicals making their employees sick. Hereâs the CDC investigation that includes ingredients and process (donât worry, we will go through it in detail):
Details of ingredients within investigation paperwork:
Now that we have a list of ingredients, letâs check them out:
INGREDIENT: SILVER IODIDE
The US government admits that silver is one of the MOST TOXIC heavy metals, yet they justify spraying it into the sky becauseâŚ
IT IS ALLOWED IN DRINKING (TAP) WATERâŚ
And, according to the Manufacturers of Silver Iodide (chemical), it is exceptionally toxic to aquatic life, meaning everything living in oceans, lakes, streams, marshes, etc:
INGREDIENT: STYRENE
Cloud Seeding ingredient STYRENE (CAS #100-42-5) is a toxic, hazardous chemical that should never be inhaled according to the manufacturer. It too causes severe damage to aquatic animals and human organs. But thatâs not all. Just like Vitamin A, Ivermectin, High Fructose Corn Syrup and the other population control poisons, Styrene also can harm an unborn child and cause fertility issues.
Category 1 means it can inflict permanent damage with a single exposure. Category 2 means it can inflict permanent damage with repeated or long-term exposure:
INGREDIENT: ALUMINUM POWDER
Cloud Seeding ingredient “Aluminum Powder” manufacturers Safety Sheet states “DO NOT ALLOW TO BECOME AIRBORNE“, also it’s toxic to eyes, skin and respiratory system (so letâs spray it in the air!)
INGREDIENT: POTASSIUM PERCHLORATE
Cloud Seeding ingredient Potassium Perchlorate (CAS #7778-74-7) is a hazardous chemical according to the manufacturer Safety Sheet. It is incompatible with fine metals,which is exactly what is in Seeding and spraying operations!
INGREDIENT: MAGNESIUM METAL POWDER
This one is absolutely insane. This ingredient, Magnesium Metal Powder (CAS #7439-95-4), is used in Cloud Seeding and insecticide. This is one of the reasons why the insects (and pollinators) are vanishing⌠because nearly every state is spraying literal insecticide.
Letâs recap what we learned is used in Cloud Seeding flares: insecticide, a hazardous chemical not compatible with metallic particles, a toxic metal composition that should never be allowed to become airborne, a hazardous chemical that can harm and kill unborn babies and one of the most toxic heavy metals that is OK to release into the environment because itâs allowed to be in drinking water. So, we release all of that and we block the sun and kill the bees, but two out of three times we can increase rainfall by 10%-35%, but sometimes it turns into hail and we need to send shockwaves into the atmosphere to stop the basketball-sized chunks from destroying our lives. Makes sense to me!
Yep, when you combine aluminum with magnesium it clots the blood. Now you know why they are pushing magnesium supplementsso hard! âŚFolks, all of the ingredients are chemicals. They are all toxic. Theyâre all poison. Thereâs no point in continuing to review them. If what I have shown you this far doesnât convince you, then, by all means, keep your blinders on and cheer for the government âjust making some rainâ.
In 1974, Kissinger announced the âworld population plan of actionâ under Nixonâs presidency. NSSM 200 is nothing short of an atrocious secret government document talking about the capping of the worldâs population at 8 billion. This menacing declaration of genocide was official US government policy and has been declassified in part (Document link)
Mass Ivermectin Administration
According to an article from Merck, they have shipped 4 billion doses of one version of Ivermectin, Mectizan, to people of poor countries:
âThe Program reaches more than 400 million people annually; over 4 billion Mectizan [Ivermectin] 3mg tablets have been shipped to endemic countries by Merck since the inception of MDP in 1987.â
According to another Merck article, they claim the total Ivermectin doses donated surpasses 4.4 Billion⌠with the help of a public-partnership between Merck, the Task Force for Global Health & the WHO.
Hereâs a list of all the countries that receive or have received Ivermectin donations from Merck (as per Mectizan Donation Program article):
American Samoa, Angola, Benin, Brazil, Burkina, Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Colombia, Congo, Cook Islands, CĂ´te d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ecuador, Egypt, Ethiopia, Fiji, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Kiribati, Liberia, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mexico, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, SĂŁo TomĂŠ and PrĂncipe, Tanzania, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Vietnam, Wallis and Futuna & Yemen
In part 1 and part 2 of the Ivermectin Vs Fertility series, we looked at a number of very concerning studies showing deleterious fertility effects of ivermectin. Letâs examine 3 of these studies again:
Study 1
In a study called âAdverse effects of repeated doses of Ivermectin alone or with the combination of vitamin C on reproductive system of female rabbitsâ by Jawad et al, researchers tested different amounts of Ivermectin and Vitamin C on rabbits and measured the number of offspring they beget.
âThe results of fertility study revealed adverse effect of ivermectin therapy on fertility and block the pregnancy in all treated group except the fifth group which administered vitamin C only as compared with control group… In conclusion: Ivermectin has adverse effects on reproductive efficacy on female rabbitsâ
Study 2
In a study called âToxicological and pathological studies of Ivermectin on male albino ratsâ Elzoghby et al, researchers examined sperm count & percentage abnormal sperm of White Albino rats given ivermectin.
Sperm Count
âSignificant decrease in total sperm count with significant increase in sperm abnormality was also demonstrated.â
Study 3
In a study from Nigeria entitled âEffects of Ivermectin therapy on the sperm functions of Nigerian onchocerciasis patientsâ, some very concerning findings were published.
âWe observed significant reduction in the sperm counts and sperm motility of the patients tested. On the morphology there was significant increase in the number of abnormal sperm cells. This took the forms of two heads, double tails, white (albino) sperms and extraordinarily large heads. It is suspected that the above alterations in the already determined parameters of the patientsâ sperm cells could only have occurred as a result of their treatment with ivermectin.â
World Bank & Ivermectin
I was able to find 2 documents from the World Bank concerning the mass Ivermectin distribution program.
UNICEF says Ivermectin was deployed in mass in Nigeria by “109,378 community-directed distributors.” In large font UNICEF emphatically quotes a Nigerian man “I wish I had this knowledge previously, especially about the medicine called Mectizan (Ivermectin). My child wouldn’t have died.” This utterance is alleged to have occurred “after attending a community outreach session run by UNICEF-trained leaders.” It goes without saying that UNICEF cannot be trusted to properly capture peoples’ sentiments in this cherry-picked quote.
UNICEF writes in the Forbes article:
“A UNICEF partner since 1991, the pharmaceutical company Merck & Co. donates Mectizan (originally known as ivermectin) to fight river blindness. Merck works with UNICEF and other organizations to distribute the drug free of charge to all who need it.”
According to an article by PostSen.com, 79.5% of Brazillians surveyed reported using Ivermectin when they had symptoms of covid in 2022. The poll was conducted by the Barcelona Global Health Institute.
The UN And Depopulation
The United Nations and the billionaire oligarchs who control them seem much more interested in reducing the future population than alleviating suffering or helping human health & well-being.
I recently put together a compilation of video clips exposing the hidden genocide from the mouths of some of the key perpetrators:
Many of these depopulation proponents are tied in closely with the United Nations.
Overlap With The Tetanus Hcg Immunocontraceptives Disguised As Vaccines
While on the topic of NSSM 200, itâs helpful to remind ourselves of the atrocities seemingly perpetrated by the WHO and UNâs UNICEF agency with sterilants in the vaccine.
I know this article is going to get swarmed with hate, just like my vitamin investigations. Posting content like this leads to a loss of subscribers therefore a loss of revenue. This is why everyone will discuss how bad processed food is but few will discuss processed supplements and processed medicines. I wonder why that is? Why arenât we allowed to ask, âWhat ingredients are in this? How are they made? What exactly do these ingredients do when we consume them?â⌠those seem like reasonable questions to me. After all, most of us read labels before buying a product at the grocery store so why is it taboo to read the label of a health product? Or a miracle cure? Is wanting to know what we are swallowing or injecting really that outrageous? I donât think so but as I have demonstrated, simply saying, âHey guys, this product contains hazardous ingredients. Hereâs the data from the manufacturerâ gets me labeled a shill, a conspiracy theorist and a confused idiot.
However, Iâm not here to appease the masses and I have nothing to sell you, 100% of my income comes from donations and subscriptions, so call me whatever youâd like, cancel your account, speak ill of me, whatever you feel is justified as a response to looking at ingredients in a product famous doctors, the CDC, the NIH, Merck and Billy-boy Gates are recommending.
Over the past year, I have been obsessed with researching the foundations for what we assume to be true, yet never questioned. Alarmingly, it seems everything I have looked into is never what we have been told it is (âVitaminsâ, Dinosaurs, Satellites FFS!, GeoEngineering, Covid, Covid masks, you name it, itâs probably a lie). So, when my friend
Tim Truth created a video talking about Ivermectin being a fertility reducing poison pushed on us as a cure, I wasnât surprised but I was very disappointed. The reason for my disappointment was that I never questioned what exactly Ivermectin is or what is in it. Iâm not exactly sure why I blindly trusted strangers online for medical advice. I cannot come up with a single good reason, but looking back, I can clearly see the Psychological Operation (PSYOP) ran on the populous, especially with Ivermectin.
When the media came out against Ivermectin, because I donât trust the media, I got suckered into believing it must be a wonder drug. After all, the guy who invented it won awards, right?! And so many people were saying it cured them! Not only did I blindly trust, I spent hundreds of dollars stocking up, in fear that it might be banned. I wanted to be sure this miracle treatment would be available for my family. I even saved the link to Dr. Stella Immanuelâs website where she will prescribe you Ivermectin (for a fee). (btw, it was embarrassing just to type all of that)
After listening to Timâs show, I wanted to look into the real history of Ivermectin but there didnât appear to be any content of this nature available online other than short-and-sweet, sugarcoated summaries on the NIH, CDC and Merckâs websites. Since I am on a mission to discover the foundation of things we assume to be true, I decided to dig into it.
Hereâs my research. Hopefully you choose to read it with an open mind, and if not, thatâs fine too. If Ivermectin is helping you, FANTASTIC! TAKE IT! I want everyone to do what they feel is right. I want all of us to be happy and healthy. Without further ado, letâs begin:
THE PROBLEM
Every solution starts with a problem and this is how Ivermectin came to be. You see, people living in fertile river valleys in the tropical and Sahel regions of Africa, Yemen, southern Mexico, Guatemala, Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela, and the Brazilian Amazon were developing one, or more, of the following symptoms:
Letâs condense the list to skin and eye issues. These symptoms would eventually be named River Blindness. The medical term is Onchocerciasis.
River Blindness was such a problem that a super-creepy postage stamp would be created to raise awareness:
THE STUDIES
Nobody knew what was causing River Blindness, so in the late 1800s and early 1900s, it was suggested that perhaps black flies, which live near bodies of water, were causing the health problems (skin and eye issues).
[Keep in mind, this exact timeframe was the beginning of Virus Theory, Germ Theory, Vaccine Theory and what I will call Vitamin Theory. All of these theories are based on Immune System Theory. All of these theories rely on, âyour body needs this lab-made product to be healthyâ. And all of these theories are all highly profitable, that part is not a theory.]
A handful of scientific experiments were conducted to determine if black flies were the cause of these symptoms. As you read through these studies, keep in mind, this research became the foundation for what would known as Ivermectin:
A document written in 1922 discusses how eight different experiments were ran by different scientists to prove the existence of insect larvae in the bloodstream of humans who were infected with the aforementioned symptoms. All of the experiments produced, âalmost completely negative resultsâ. Meaning, nothing had been found in the blood of people deemed to be infected.
In one of those experiments, a scientist examined 2,000 cases (infected people), and only once was he able to locate larvae. In this single instance, the scientist claimed that he squeezed them out of some dudes finger (for real, thatâs what the paper states). The document says, he âsqueezed the finger powerfullyâ until it bled. That blood was used for a blood smear and, allegedly, larvae were present. Nobody was able to replicate these results. The scientist himself was unable to duplicate the result. Larvae never appeared in the remaining 1,999 infected people.
In another experiment, 290 men with skin issues were selected. Out of these 290, 24 were investigated further. Although doctors did not locate larvae inside these men they did locate tumors, lots of tumors. More studies of the same nature were conducted which also found tumors. It was then hypothesized that black flies might cause tumors.
Another set of experiments involved two men who were already suffering from the aforementioned symptoms. These men allowed black flies to bite them. The flies were then dissected. Science claimed to have discovered that the infection from the men was present in some, but not all, of the flies that bit them. Science was unable to determine the reason why half of the flies did not contain the infection.
In the three studies that followed, flies were fed something science deemed to be infected then the flies were dissected. The results were the same as the prior study, meaning some flies allegedly had the infection in them while others did not, despite consuming the same infected food.
This evidence somehow confirmed that the health problems (skin and eye issues) were likely caused by larvae. They theorized this larvae was spread from person to person through ârepeated bitesâ of a black fly.
THE FLY BITE STUDIES
The next studies were to prove the larvae, theoretically transmitted through a fly bite, grow inside people and cause illness, which was a key component to the fly bite transmission theory.In this study, two monkeys were given injections of âadvanced stage fly larvaeâ which the scientists claim to have extracted from the heads of dissected flies who were deemed to be carrying the infection. The scientists injected the larvae under the monkeys skin. One monkey received the injection âin the headâ and the other received it âin the flankâ. As of two months later, neither monkey showed any symptoms of disease. There is no further mention of the larvae.
Because the monkey studies were unsuccessful, scientists switched to using other animals and methods. These new methods involved dorsal fins, removing slices of skin then keeping the skin alive to run wacky tests on it, centrifuging blood samples to try to find larvae, and more ⌠that was when I stopped reading because it was pointless.
After three hours of digging, I am unable to locate a single study that demonstrates a perfectly healthy person who did not have parasites, worms, larvae, nor any form of disease, was bit by a fly which transmitted larvae, causing disease. This is very concerning because it is the foundation for everything that follows. If you can find a normal study that took place on healthy humans and didnât involve a human injecting another human with anything please share the links.
FIGHTING THE DISEASE
Up until this point, citizens who were deemed to be infected were being fed highly toxic poisons as medicine. These ineffective and deadly chemical compositions were called Diethylcarbamazine and Suramin.
Despite the medicine being labeled a cure, it was not curing anyone, so Science told the citizens that the only way they can save themselves is if they move away from the rivers to prevent the disease. The relocation had devastating impacts on the communities. When they surrendered their natural resource, the river, they were no longer near water, therefore could no easily longer grow food and now had to travel to access water. To make matters worse, the relocation did not stop the disease the flies were causing.
Surprisingly, the repeated poisoning of the river did not stop people from developing skin and eye issues. Want to know why? Donât you dare say, âbecause the flies never caused the disease to begin withâ, thatâs something a conspiracy theorist would say! The correct answer is, history claims,âimmigrant flies began to reinvade treated rivers, and some flies developed resistance to the insecticides used by the program.â⌠so, to recap: feeding the people poisonmedicine didnât work, moving away from the river didnât work and poisoning the river over and over didnât work. People were somehow still developing skin issues and eye issues.
In 1971, a scientist named Satoshi Ĺmura traveled from Japan to the US to meet with other scientists including the head of Merck Research Laboratories. He was given money by the NIH and several large pharmaceutical companies âto search for naturally occurring novel therapeuticsâ. In 1973, only two years after the meeting and funding, he was contracted by Merck to work for them.
History claims, shortly after the contract was signed, Satoshi took a soil sample from a golf course and it just so happened that this sample contained a new, undiscovered bacteria. This bacteria was said to have killed parasites in soil.
Long story short, Merck created a concoction in a lab, said it was the same as the dirt-bacteria, and it was called Avermectin / Avermectin B1. Ivermectin is a chemically modified derivative of Avermectin B1.
When Ivermectin first went to market it was sold as a parasite medicine for animals. This chemical blend was labeledâ25 times more potentâ than existing parasite medications.
Merckâs human-drugs division realized that if Ivermectin could enter the human market the profit potential was unfathomable. So, Merck did what it needed to do to demonstrate that this product (recently discovered in that golf course soil sample then produced in a lab with chemicals) was a cure for humans too.
Since science had somehow proven River Blindness was caused by larvae transmitted through repeated bites from a black fly, this was the perfect target market for Merckâs animal product. With the support of the WHO, clinical trials began in 1981, resulting in the approval of Merckâs Ivermectin drug being used in humans. Merck named the human version of the drug Mectizan. (Mectizan was the brand name whereas Ivermectin is the generic drug name, meaning they are they same thing, both of which are derived from lab-made Avermectins, which we are told is the same as the dirt-bacteria discovered by the dude at the golf course, right after the injection of pharmaceutical company funding.)
Ivermectin would become one of Merckâs best selling products of all time. Within 25 years sales would exceeded $1 billion dollars.
Merck stated that because of the financial success of their animal parasite drug, they were able to afford to do good in the world by donating millions of doses per year to the people living in regions that have infected flies. Just in 2006, Merck donated over 69 million doses.
Now that you know the real history of Ivermectin, lets take a deeper look at what exactly it is.
HOW ITâS MADE
History claims the bacteria in the soil discovered by Satoshi Ĺmura was Streptomyces avermitilis (S. avermitilis). Just like we learned in my Pfizer Cheese article and WTF! How Vitamins are Made piece, this stuff they are selling us isnât natural. They are not bottling golf course soil bacteria. In the case of Vitamins and Ivermectin, what we are purchasing is being made in a lab through microbial fermentation. Hereâs a brief overview of how Avermectins are mass produced:
S. avermitilis41445 is the bacteria strain you start with:
yeast extract malt extract glucose (YMG) is fed to the bacteria to grow it:
All of those ingredients are going to eventually result in the production of Avermectins, which they call industrially derived mutants. But get thisâŚ
IVERMECTIN: DEADLY INSECTICIDE
These lab-made GMO Avermectins, created from mutant bacteria (Streptomyces avrrmitillis) are so toxic that they kill Arthropods.
Arthropods areinvertebrates with jointed legs, including lobsters, crabs, scorpions, bees, butterflies, spiders and more.
They make up about 84% of all animals on Earth.
Arthropods have a major role in maintaining ecosystems as pollinators, recyclers of nutrients, scavengers and food for other animals. But if you want to kill them, Ivermectin works great! Need to massacre some blue crabs? Get out the Ivermectin:
Yep, Ivermectin is an excellent poison to slaughter these dudes:
One must ask, how much of the 84% OF ALL CREATURES IN THE WORLD can this substance kill?
Because of its effectiveness in demolishing Arthropods, Avermectin B1 / Abamectin / Ivermectin is used as an insecticide.
And only 0.05% of it is needed to kill life:
It is the main active ingredient in cockroach killer:
Ivermectin was registered as Fire Ant Killer with the EPA back in the 1980s and has been used as an ant killer ever since.
And to kill the alleged parasites in our bloodstream (transmitted from fly bites), this poison has to be in our blood. I know people are going to say, âItâs only toxic to insects! It doesnât hurt people!â. I find it really strange how often people say this now. Vitamin D IS Rat Poison, but they tell me it doesnât hurt people.Vitamin B3 IS insecticide that contaminated a city, but that doesnât hurt people either. K2 IS pesticide and rat poison, but it doesnât hurt people. Vitamin B is made from cyanide, but itâs a special type of cyanide that doesnât hurt people (also developed by Merck). Ivermectin IS insecticide, but it doesnât hurt people. Why are all these vitamins and miracle cures literal poison that kills life? And what do all of these healthy poisons have in common? Merck, Bill Gates, the United Nations and pals give them away for free to help people⌠Does nobody else find that fact to be eyebrow-raising?âŚ
And I know someone is going to say, âEverything is poison! Itâs the dose that makes it safe!â – NO, everything is not poison. Nobody got diabetes from eating too many apples. Nobody had a heart attack from too much broccoli. Hell, nobody has ever become obese from pounding bags of carrots all day. Not everything is poison. And nobody ever died from drinking too much clean water either. I might write a post just on that because it is the most common rebuttal and itâs simply false.
For the sake of being a thorough journalist, just to be 100% sure this product is only poison for 84% of life on earth but not humans, letâs check out the manufacturers safety data sheets for Ivermectin:
THE SAFETY DATA SHEETS
A Manufacturers Safety Data Sheet (MSDS / SDS) is what is provided by the company who makes the chemical product. The MSDS outlines how to handle the product, how to dispose of it without damaging the environment, what to do if it is inhaled or swallowed, if employees need to wear respirators around it, health issues that result from the product, etc. You canât get any closer to the truth than by looking at the data directly from the company who makes the product because, for legal reasons, the manufacturer cannot lie or sugarcoat Safety Data Sheets.
In Section 2 of the MSDS we see this is a very toxic product. Category 1 means it can inflict permanent damage with a single exposure.Category 2 means it can inflict damage with repeated or prolonged exposure. We also learn that it attacks the Central Nervous System:
An attack on the Central Nervous System (CNS) can result in a wide range of horrible side effects including vision loss / blindness, infections (such as meningitis, carpal tunnel syndrome), paralysis, severe headaches, confusion, seizures, weakness, Guillain-BarrĂŠ Syndrome, stroke, and genetic predisposition. But thatâs not all. A CNS attack can also result in a plethora of skin issues including Skin Discoloration (Ataxia-telangiectasia and Tuberous sclerosis complex). This is Tuberous sclerosis complex, a side effect of a Central Nervous System attack:
This is River Blindness, caused by larvae:
Tuberous sclerosis complex rash, a side effect of a Central Nervous System attack:
River Blindness caused by larvae:
In Section 3 of the Veterinary MSDS for Ivermectin we are provided with a list of chemicals in the product:
I donât want to dive into all of these, but hereâs a couple:
Propylene Glycol (âPGâ) removes water, therefore it is dumped into everything to act as a preservative. It is also used as a flavoring agent, a dough-strengthener and an emulsifier. You will find this chemical in pharmaceuticals, foods, and personal care products. As with all chemicals, it too is toxic and this product specifically causes kidney injury.
Interestingly, PG can also cause âsepsis-like syndromeâ. According to the WHO, spesis is caused by bacteria or parasites.
So, 49% of each dose of animal Ivermectin can cause the identical problems it is taken to stop or prevent. But no need to worry, thatâs Ivermectin made for animals, not people. The FDA has classified PG as generally safe for humans to eat:
Butanone is another ingredient in animal Ivermectin. It is also used in plastic welding because it dissolves plastic. It is used in dry erase markers to make the erasable dye⌠and it is great for healthy medicines for animals and humans.
Butanone accounts for 10% of the animal product and it too is hugely toxic. In fact, it is so toxic that as of 2010, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was forced to add butanone to its dangerous, toxic chemicals list because of the neuropsychological effects it causesdue to being rapidly absorbed through undamaged skin and lungs. This dangerous chemical also contributes to the formation of ground-level ozone, which is toxic, even in low concentrations. But people are going to say, âThis is for animals, not humans!â. Ok, letâs make sure that is trueâŚ
Next we will look at Fisherâs MSDS for Ivermectin. This Safety Data Sheet specifies to only use it in a lab and not to use it a âfood, drug, pesticideâ or to kill anything.
The reason I show you this is because, even though this Ivermectin states not to use it as food, medicine or pesticide, it has the exact same hazard classifications at the veterinary use Ivermectin:
Additionally, you will see that this product is labeled hazardous. It also damages fertility and can harm an unborn baby. In fact, it is a Category 1A, which means âknown human reproductivetoxicantâ (meaning, it is not suspected to cause harm, it does cause harm):
In the image above, we also see that it is Fatal if Swallowed.
Here we see that if it is ingested a poison center should be called immediately. We also learn it is âvery toxic to aquatic lifeâ.
I know the response is going to be, âBut that says not to use as medicine! Show me a safety data sheet for the medicine version or you’re a shill!â – Ok, I will do you one better than that.
I went on a mission to find the best of the best of the absolute best, most-purest-ever Ivermectin. I was able to locate a couple USP grade Ivermectinâs that exceed pharmaceutical standards. These are as pure and clean as it is ever going to get!
Here it is, at the hefty price of $144 for only one kilo (2 pounds)!
As we can see from the image above, this Ivermectin is a mixture of two Avermectins.
The good news is, although this product is considered Hazardous, it is a Category 2 and 3 Hazard. This means it might cause permanent damage with repeated or prolonged use and it is suspected of causing harm but it is not guaranteed that it will cause harm, so thatâs good.
If we scroll down to Label Elements we see the same warnings as the other products:
And the skull graphic is required, because it is deadly.
To be more specific the skull pictogram means Acute Toxicity. The legal definition is, âAcute toxicity means that exposure to a single dose of the chemical may be toxic or fatal if inhaled or swallowed, or if it comes into contact with the skin.â
Oh look, it also can affect the central nervous system, just like the other Ivermectins:
When this product ships it must ship as Toxic Solids and Hazardous Waste:
In Europe, three additional Hazard Classes must be added in addition to a second skull:
To recap: the animal version of Ivermectin is a hazardous toxin, the lab-use-only version is a hazardous toxin and even if you spend the money to buy the absolute best, top shelf, cleanest-ever Ivermectin, it is still a hazardous poison that is âvery toxic if swallowedâ.
MERCK, THE EPA AND THE GOVERNMENT
Remember how, on the purest-of-pure Ivermectin USP grade MSDS, it says Ivermectin is a mixture of Avermectins (mutant bacteria stuff made in a lab):
I located a 2008 document from the Canadian Government website, OEHHA.ca.gov. In the document they discuss the US government labeling Avermectin B1 a reproductive toxin back in 1994.
Because Merck was making Ivermectin using Avermectin, this same document features a response from Merck regarding the safety of Ivermectin. Quote:
âMerck states that primates are less sensitive to the acute effects of abamectin and its analog, ivermectin, than rodents. The commenter implies that because humans are primates, abamectin should be less toxic in humans than in rodents.â ⌠âAbamectin interferes with gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transmission and, as such, produces neurotoxic clinical signs such as tremors, ataxia, convulsions, or comathat are more severe in rodents and dogs than primates.â⌠âThere are no developmental studies with abamectin in primates. Therefore, EPA believes that the rodent studies cited in the proposed rule provide sufficient evidence that abamectin can reasonably be anticipated to cause developmental toxicity in humans.â – well thatâs interesting, eh?
IVERMECTIN AND FERTILITY REDUCTION
Tim Truth did a deep dive into Ivermectin and how it plummets fertility. While you listen to this, remember that everything is based on the premise that a black fly transmits larvae that causes skin issues and blindess. (58 minute video. If it wonât play, audio-only version is below. If that wonât play either, watch on Bitchute)