Did Weather Wars Take Out the Iranian President OR UAP is again the culprit?

Timing is everything, and the timing of Iranian President’s death is highly suspect. Here’s why…..

The understanding of weather manipulation as a weapon is becoming more evident. The idea that a hostile nation could use such technology to carry out a covert assassination is not beyond the realm of possibility.
The tragic helicopter crash that claimed the life of Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi has raised suspicions among many who question whether the incident was truly an accident or a carefully orchestrated assassination. While the State of Israel has denied any involvement, the circumstances surrounding the crash have led to speculation that weather manipulation may have played a role in the president’s untimely demise.

The Iranian president was returning from a visit to Azerbaijan when his helicopter encountered what was described as rapidly developing “heavy fog” in the mountainous region of Varzaqan. However, the sudden onset of the weather event has raised eyebrows among citizens familiar with the weaponization of weather.
The National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) has accused Israel of involvement in the incident. They believe that Israel, with its advanced weather modification technology, may have manipulated the weather conditions to create a dense fog, effectively setting the stage for the helicopter crash.
To add to the suspicion, Iranian weather from May 19th, the day of the helicopter crash, has been removed.

Iran has long accused the West, particularly Israel, of using weather manipulation as a means of sabotage. In 2011, former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claimed that European countries were using “special equipment” to drain clouds of rainwater before they reached Iran. While these claims were met with skepticism at the time, the current situation has reignited interest in the potential use of weather warfare.
Just days before the tragic incident, Raisi had announced a groundbreaking deal with India regarding the Chabahar Port. This strategic move would grant India access to landlocked Afghanistan and Central Asia, bypassing its rival Pakistan. This agreement, met with warnings of potential sanctions from the United States, signaled Iran’s willingness to challenge the existing power dynamics in the region.
The timing of Raisi’s death becomes even more peculiar when considering the recent announcement by Iranian Ambassador to Russia, Kazem Jalali, about the collaboration between Iran and Russia on creating a single currency for the BRICS bloc. This move, aimed at reducing the dominance of the U.S. dollar in international trade, could have far-reaching implications for the global financial system. The fact that Raisi’s helicopter crashed just days and hours after these significant announcements raises questions about the possibility of foul play, as the late president’s actions were clearly challenging the interests of major global powers.

Poor visibility and rugged terrain would have made it nearly impossible for any survivors to be rescued in a timely manner. This has fueled suspicions among specific segments of the Iranian population, who question whether the crash was purely accidental or if there may have been other factors at play.
The Iranian government has yet to release an official statement, and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has not suggested foul play or blamed Israel. However, the suspicions surrounding the incident are unlikely to dissipate anytime soon. Particularly when posts such as this are put out adding fuel to the fire:

As the world grapples with the implications of President Raisi’s untimely demise, it is imperative that we address the looming threat of weather manipulation as a weapon. The international community must unite to enforce the comprehensive global ban on weather warfare known as ENMOD. Until such measures are in place, I encourage all heads of state to take a bus with bulletproof glass and additional airbags when traveling. No Joke.

Attributions: https://reinettesenumsfoghornexpress.substack.com/p/did-weather-wars-take-out-the-iranian?publication_id=943736&post_id=144806548&isFreemail=false&r=r91bi&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email



Israeli AI(Artificial Intelligence)

Recently exposed¹: an AI program called Lavender identified, tracked, and targeted people in Gaza it IDed as associated in some way (even vaguely) with Hamas—targeted them for killing by Israeli Armed forces.This is unprecedented in the history of warfare.But not the brutality of it. Not by a longshot. In 1945, for example, British and US Air Forces firebombed and destroyed the whole German city of Dresden. And of course, the US dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.But the Israeli military used AI. A program. A non-human program to ID people for killing.What’s next? AI actually issuing the commands to murder large numbers of people? And if remotely operated drones are the method, humans are out of the picture completely?And humans can claim “plausible deniability?”As AI moves into every area of life, humans can shrug and say, “It’s the program.” Do what the program says. Because there is no other option. The system runs things, and the system is AI.People scoff at the idea that AI could run whole areas of government—but this Israeli AI proves it’s possible.AI could operate new medical drug approval. The program would be set up to favor Pharma’s interests above the safety of the public.But of course the PR for such a program would go this way: “Finally we have a system that is objective and eliminates unconscious human bias.”Imagine a court case where a government bureaucrat is put on trial for refusing to carry out a direct AI order.The judge rules: “The AI system is duly constituted to control this area of decision. The employee who purposely countermanded the system is therefore guilty of failing to follow protocol…”The same situation in the private sector would be even tighter—because a corporation would claim its AI is proprietary and unique and beyond the reach of law enforcement.All its workers, as a condition of employment, signed a statement agreeing to follow AI commands. Therefore, the worker who disobeyed is fined, fired (and blacklisted in the industry).And suppose that corporation is a large news outlet, and the employee they just fired was a reporter who wrote a story exposing massive corruption in a city prosecutor’s office?An AI interceded and killed the story before it was published, and the reporter went rogue and did a podcast accusing the AI and his bosses of defrauding the public.But alas, the non-human AI that sets the standards of journalism at the outlet is “duly constituted by the executive board.”How about a Climate Change AI installed at the Dept. of Homeland Security?

ATTRIBUTIONS: https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/israeli-ai-targeted-hamas-for-destruction?publication_id=806546&post_id=143413333&isFreemail=true&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo4NTM4MTI4MywicG9zdF9pZCI6MTQzNDEzMzMzLCJpYXQiOjE3MTI2NjI3ODMsImV4cCI6MTcxNTI1NDc4MywiaXNzIjoicHViLTgwNjU0NiIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.f7pwXjMCs3AboMmhwv5tYQ35WQuwlqYDqJ3gs5FLWEE&r=1eu0mb&triedRedirect=true

Is Hamas the Bait of the US and Israel For a New Middle East War?

A Geopoltical Anlysis by Germán Gorraiz López

Germán López Gorraiz, press photo

Germán López Gorraiz, press photo

A New Middle East War could involve the three superpowers, the US, China and Russia, counting as necessary collaborations with regional powers such as Israel and Iran. This may lead to the restoration of the Balfour Declaration and another Cold War between the US and Russia

By Germán Gorraiz López, Geopolitical Analyst

The foundations of the greater Near East were laid in the Quincey Pact (1945) following the doctrine of the 1916 Sykes-Picot Franco-British Accords that favoured the regional division of power into zones of influence and supported by the US-Egypt-Saudi tripod.

This doctrine consisted in the endemic survival in Egypt of pro-Western autocratic military governments, which ensured the survival of the State of Israel (1948) and provided the US Navy with privileged access to the Suez Canal, a crucial shortcut for direct access to the Arab Emirates, Iraq and Afghanistan, remaining a firm bastion of US geopolitical interests. in the area, especially after the fall of the Shah of Persia in 1980.

The other pillar of the agreement was US-privileged access to oil from Saudi Arabia in exchange for preserving its autocratic regime and promoting the spread of Wahhabism. Mohamed Abdel Wahab founded the doctrine in the mid-18th century with the aim of becoming an attractive vision of Islam and exportable to the rest of Arab countries, with which the Saudi theocracy became a regional power providing the US.

This was the key to energy control while serving as a retaining wall for socialist and pan-Arabist currents.

Finally, after the Six Day War (1967), the geostrategic puzzle of the Middle East was completed with the establishment of autocratic and pro-Western regimes in the countries surrounding Israel ( Libya, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran) and the Palestinians remain confined in the ghettos of the West Bank and Gaza.

Are the US and Israel looking to redesign the cartography of the Middle East?

Taking advantage of the alleged security holes in the Israeli Defense caused by the schism between the reservists and Netanyahu, the armed wing of the Islamist group Hamas launched the largest military offensive since 2007.

It was possible because of the infiltration of tens of its members into Israeli localities and the launching of thousands of projectiles into large areas, including Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

The offensive extends to the Lebanese and Syrian border with the entry on stage of Hezbollah and members of the Fatemiyoun Brigade, a Shiite militia with organic dependence on the elite of the Iranian Armed Forces or Pasdars.

Thus, after the fiascos of Syria, Libya and Iraq, the offensive of Hamas would be the new bait of the Machiavellian plan outlined by the Anglo-American alliance in 1960 to attract both Russia and China and provoke a major regional conflict that would mark the evolution of the area in the coming years.

That would be a new local episode that would be framed in return to the recurring endemism of the Cold War between the US and Russia.

“Operation Persia” and the New Middle East War

Taking advantage of the fact that Russia is occupied with Ukraine, China is surrounded by the AUKUS nuclear crisis arc to protect Taiwan, and that US strategic reserves are at their highest, the Pentagon would have designed “Operation Persia”.

After being accused of being the instigator of the Hamas attack, The US used an initial surprise attack by Israel on Iran to start a new war in the Middle East with the dual objective of drying up China’s energy sources and climbing its popularity index to be re-elected in the upcoming 2024 presidential election.

A New Middle East War could involve the three superpowers, the US, China and Russia, counting as necessary collaborations with regional powers Israel, Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Iran.

It would cover the geographical space that extends from the Mediterranean arc (Israel, Syria and Lebanon) to Yemen and Somalia with the avowed aim of designing the cartography of the New Middle East favourable to the geopolitical interests of the US, Britain and Israel with the implementation of Great Israel (“Eretz Israel”).

This would entail the restoration of the Balfour Declaration (1,917), which drew the State of Israel with a vast extension of about 46,000 square miles and extending from the Mediterranean east of the Euphrates to Syria, Lebanon, north-eastern Iraq, the northern part of Saudi Arabia, the coastal strip of the Red Sea and the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt and Jordan

The new land would be renamed Palesjordán after being forced to host the entire Palestinian population of the current West Bank and Gaza, forced into a massive diaspora (new nakba).

By Germán Gorraiz López, Geopolitical Analyst. Read more by Gorraiz López

The Rise of the Global Police State

The Rise of the Global Police State

publicerad 17 oktober 2023

Drone photo: Derbyshire Police, EnglandIcke essentiella aktiviteter. Drönarfoto: Derbyshire Police, England

“Non-essential activities” during the 2020-22 Covid years.

At this point in time, it’s crucial to realize that the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are part of the plan to implement a One World Government, where the entire world will be run by unelected bureaucrats beholden to technocratic ideals.

By Dr. Joseph Mercola. This article was first published on Mercola.com

Story at-a-glance

  • The United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals are not about sustainability. They’re tools to facilitate the implementation of a One World Government.
  • The term the globalist alliance uses to describe its network is a “global public-private partnership,” or G3P. The G3P is composed of most of the world’s governments, intergovernmental organizations, global corporations, major philanthropic foundations, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and civil society groups. Collectively, they are the “stakeholders” that are implementing the SDGs.
  • While SDG16 claims to advance “peaceful and inclusive societies” and “justice for all,” this goal is really about consolidating authority, exploiting threats to advance regime hegemony, and implementing a centrally controlled global system of digital identity (digital ID).
  • A digital identity is not merely a form of identification. Your “identity” is who you are, and a digital identity will keep a permanent record of your choices and behaviors, 24/7. Universal adoption of digital identity will enable the G3P global governance regime to establish a behavioral-based system of reward and punishment.
  • The COVID pandemic was used to redefine human rights and to get people used to the idea that the rights of individuals are conditional and can be ignored or suspended “for the greater good.” The United Nations’ Charter establishes a global governance regime that stands against freedom, justice and peace, and all of the UN’s SDGs need to be understood within this context.

In a two-part Unlimited Hangout investigative series,1,2 independent journalists Iain Davis and Whitney Webb expose how Sustainable Development Goal No. 16 (SDG16), which claims to advance “peaceful and inclusive societies” and “justice for all,” is really about consolidating authority, exploiting threats to advance regime hegemony, and forcing a “centrally controlled global system of digital identity3 (digital ID) upon humanity.”

As explained in Part 1,4 the term the globalist alliance of technocrats use to describe its network is a “global public-private partnership,” or G3P:

“The G3P is toiling tirelessly to create the conditions necessary to justify the imposition of both global governance ‘with teeth’ and its prerequisite digital ID system. In doing so, the G3P is inverting the nature of our rights. It manufactures and exploits crises in order to claim legitimacy for its offered ‘solutions.’

The G3P comprises virtually all of the world’s intergovernmental organizations, governments, global corporations, major philanthropic foundations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and civil society groups. Collectively, these form the ‘stakeholders’ implementing sustainable development, including SDG16.”

The following chart, sourced from IanDavis.com,5 illustrates how the G3P operates.

How the g3p operates. Chart by Mercola.com
How the g3p operates. Chart by Mercola.com

What SDG16 Is Really About

The central objective of SDG16 is to strengthen the UN-led regime, and of all the subgoals included in this SDG, the establishment of “a legal identity for all” (SDG16.9), is the most crucial, as other goals rely on the use of digital identity. As noted by Davis and Webb:6

“Universal adoption of SDG16.9 digital ID will enable the G3P global governance regime’s to establish a worldwide system of reward and punishment. If we accept the planned model of digital ID, it will ultimately enslave us in the name of sustainable development …

SDG16.9 ‘sustainable development’ means we must use digital ID … Otherwise we will not be protected in law, service access will be denied, our right to transact in the modern economy will be removed, we will be barred from participating as ‘citizens’ and excluded from so-called ‘democracy.’”

Understanding Digital Identity

The World Economic Forum (WEF), founded by Schwab, has for years promoted the implementation of digital identity. The problem with calling it “digital ID” is that people misunderstand it to be something it’s not. There’s a huge difference between identity and identification.7

Identification refers to documents that prove you are who you say you are. A digital identity is NOT merely a form of identification. Your “identity” is who you actually are, and a digital identity will keep a permanent record of your choices and behaviors, 24/7.

Your identity encompasses everything that makes you unique, and that’s what the globalist cabal is really after. Step out of line, and every social media interaction, every penny spent and every move you’ve ever made can be used against you.

Indeed, having access to everyone’s digital identity is the key to successful manipulation and control of the global population. The graphic below, from the WEF, illustrates their idea of how your digital identity will interact with the world.

Everything you can think of is to be connected to your digital identity, and your behavior, beliefs and opinions will dictate what you can and cannot do within society. It will unlock doors where someone like you is welcome, and lock the ones where you’re not.

If you think the idea of vaccine passports is insane, wait until your access to critical infrastructure and services is dependent not just on your vaccination status, but also what books you’ve bought, what ideas you’ve shared, and who you’ve given money or emotional support to.

Digital Identity
Digital Identity. Chart by Mercola.com

Interoperability Will Link Disparate Systems Together

As people are coming to understand the threat of a One World Government, resistance against digital ID and the social credit score that comes with it has started to mount. The G3P’s answer to that dilemma is the construction of an interoperable system that can link disparate digital ID systems together. As explained by Davis and Webb:8

“This ‘modular platform’ approach is designed to avoid the political problems that the official issuance of a national digital ID card would otherwise elicit.

Establishing SDG16.9 global digital ID is crucial for 8 of the 17 UN SDGs. It is the linchpin at the center of a global digital panopticon that is being devised under the auspices of the UN’s global public-private partnership ‘regime.’”

You Have No Rights, Only Permits, Under the New World Order

You may be wondering where human rights enter into all of this. If your digital ID records every move you make, which can then be used against you, won’t that violate some of your basic rights as a free human being? Well, that depends on how human rights are defined — and who defines them. Davis and Webb explain:9

“… the Universal Declaration of Human Rights … was first accepted by all members of the United Nations on December 10, 1948. The preamble of the Declaration recognizes that the ‘equal and inalienable rights’ of all human beings are the ‘foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.’

After that, ‘inalienable rights’ are never again mentioned in the entire Declaration. ‘Human rights’ are nothing like ‘inalienable rights.’

Inalienable rights, unlike human rights, are not bestowed upon us by any governing authority. Rather, they are innate to each of us. They are immutable. They are ours in equal measure. The only source of inalienable rights is Natural Law, or God’s Law.

No one — no government, no intergovernmental organization, no human institution or human ruler — can ever legitimately claim the right to grant or deny our inalienable rights. Humanity can claim no collective authority to grant or deny the inalienable rights of any individual human being.

Beyond the preamble, the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) concerns itself exclusively with ‘human rights.’ But asserting, as it does, that human rights are some sort of expression of inalienable rights is a fabrication — a lie.

Human rights, according to the UDHR, are created by certain human beings and are bestowed by those human beings upon other human beings. They are not inalienable rights or anything close to inalienable rights.

Article 6 of the UDHR and Article 16 of the UN’s 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights … both decree: ‘Everyone has the [human] right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.’

Note: We put ‘[human]’ in brackets … to alert readers that these documents are NOT referring to inalienable rights. While the respective Articles 6 and 16 sound appealing, the underlying implications are not.

Both articles mean that ‘without legal existence those rights may not be asserted by a person within the domestic legal order.’ As we shall see, the ability to prove one’s identity will become a prerequisite for ‘legal existence.’ Thus, in a post-SDG16 world, persons without UN-approved identification will be unable to assert their ‘human rights’ …

Article 29.3 of the UDHR states: ‘These [human] rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.’

In plain English: We are only allowed to exercise our alleged human ‘rights’ subject to the diktats of governments, intergovernmental organizations and other UN ‘stakeholders.’ The bottom line, then, is that what the UN calls ‘human rights’ are … government and intergovernmental permits by which our behavior is controlled.”

Covid Was an Opportunity to Reset the Playing Field

Our behavior is also controlled through censorship and control of information. In its “COVID-19 and Human Rights” document,10 published in April 2020, the UN presents human rights as policy tools and openly admits that “securing compliance” with health measures that severely restrict (or outright eliminate) human rights will depend on “building trust,” and that includes censoring that which might undermine trust in authorities.

Censorship of “misinformation” and “disinformation” is also required under the proposed International Treaty on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response, which places the World Health Organization at the center of all pandemic-related agendas, and in the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHRs). Importantly, both of these instruments will be binding. As noted by Davis and Webb:11

“The current proposed amendments12 to the IHR illustrate how ‘crises’ provide unique opportunities for the UN and its partners to control populations — through purported ‘human rights’ — by exploiting those ‘rights’ as ‘a powerful set of tools.’

Here is one example of the proposals being put forth: The WHO wishes to remove the following language from IHR Article 3.1: ‘The implementation of these Regulations shall be with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons.’

It intends to replace that regulatory principle with: ‘The implementation of these Regulations shall be based on the principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with the common but differentiated responsibilities of their States Parties, taking into consideration their social and economic development.’

This proposed amendment signifies that the UN and its partners wish to completely ignore the UN’s own Universal Declaration of Human Rights whenever any of these agencies declares a new ‘crisis’ or identifies a new ‘international threat.’ This exemplifies the ‘course-correction’ the UN envisioned would arise from the ‘unique opportunity’ presented by the COVID-19 crisis.”

The UN Has Already Assumed Authority; No One Granted It

Right now, the WHO appears to be set up to become the de facto global government, but the UN is also a contender, and it has openly assumed this authority.

For example, in its “UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda” document,13 published in 2013, it states that “A global governance regime, under the auspices of the UN, will have to ensure that the global commons will be preserved for future generations.”

The United Nation’s Charter establishes a global governance regime that stands against freedom, justice and peace, and all of the UN’s SDGs need to be understood within this context.

As noted by Davis and Webb:14

“The UN calls itself a ‘global governance regime.’ It is arbitrarily assuming the authority to seize control of everything (‘the global commons’), including humans, both by enforcing its Charter — citing its misnamed ‘Human Rights’ declaration — and by fulfilling its ‘Sustainable Development’ agenda.

Note that the ‘global governance regime’ will ultimately ‘translate into better national and regional governance.’ This means that the role of each national government is merely to ‘translate’ global governance into national policy. Electing one political party or another to undertake the translation makes no material difference. The policy is not set by the governments we elect.

As nation-states one by one implement SDG-based policies, the regime further consolidates its global governance. And since the ‘global governance regime will be critical to achieve sustainable development,’ the two mechanisms — global governance and sustainable development — are symbiotic.

Again, by the UN’s own admission, inalienable rights are the ‘foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.’ Yet the UN’s entire Charter-based human rights framework comprehensively rejects the principle of inalienable and immutable rights.

The UN Charter is, therefore, an international treaty that establishes a global governance regime which stands firmly against ‘freedom, justice and peace in the world.’ All of the UN’s ‘sustainable development’ projects should be understood in this context …

You may wonder what Sustainable Development Goal 16 … has to do with protecting the planet and its inhabitants from the predicted ‘climate disaster.’ The answer is: nothing at all. But then, ‘climate change’ is merely the proffered rationale that purportedly legitimizes and lends urgency to sustainable development.

Establishing firm global governance — in effect, a world dictatorship — through the implementation of SDGs is the United Nations’ real objective. ‘Climate change’ is just the excuse.”

‘One Health’ — The Global Takeover of Everything

The pandemic treaty and IHR amendments, once enacted, will form the foundation for the WHO’s legal authority to act as a global governing body. Both are broadly focused on pandemic preparedness, planning and response, but there are built in loopholes that can easily be invoked by the WHO to turn it into a de facto global dictatorship.

The central instrument that will allow for the vast expansion of the WHO’s power is something called the One Health Joint Plan of Action, officially launched in October 2022 by the WHO, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH).

This initiative amounts to multiple globalist organizations synchronizing their plans, while at the same time combining their resources and power.

The “One Health”15,16 agenda recognizes that a broad range of human and environmental aspects can impact health and therefore fall under the “potential” to cause harm. For example, this is how the WHO will be able to declare climate change as a health emergency and subsequently require climate lockdowns.

The graphic17 below illustrates how the WHO’s scope of control is expanded under the One Health agenda to cover vast aspects of everyday life.

One Health
One Health

On paper, the One Health Joint Plan of Action “seeks to improve the health of humans, animals, plants and the environment, while contributing to sustainable development.”18 Its five-year plan, which spans 2022 to 2026, intends to expand capacities in six key areas, including health care systems, the environment and food safety.

The plan includes a technical document that covers a set of actions intended to advance One Health at global, regional and national levels. As reported by the WHO:19

“These actions notably include the development of an upcoming implementation guidance for countries, international partners, and non-state actors such as civil society organizations, professional associations, academia and research institutions.”

In other words, the goal is to create health, environmental and food safety rules to be followed on a global scale.

The Endgame and How to Stop It

In an April 16, 2023, Substack article,20 Jessica Rose, a postdoctoral researcher in biology, tried to make sense of the last three years. Starting at the end, she believes the endgame is the “conversion of the majority of human beings into workers … like ants.”

To get there, the globalists must dehumanize us, systematically chip away at the human spirit, render us infertile and destroy all notions of bodily autonomy and national sovereignty. The plan has worked well so far, but cracks are beginning to show. More and more people are starting to put the puzzle pieces together, as Rose attempts to do in her article.

The COVID pandemic was the set-up, Rose suggests. It was geared to “test compliance levels” and set the scene for the next act, which was to normalize all things abnormal. The trans movement, which completely overwhelmed the social consciousness in a single year, is a continuation and expansion of that “normalization of the abnormal” phase.

It’s also a major component of the agenda to dehumanize and sterilize the population. After all, trans youth — who are also among the most brainwashed individuals in society right now — are the future of humanity. A brand-new report by legal experts backed by the United Nations is also seeking to normalize pedophilia,21 which would further dehumanize and de-spirit our youth for generations to come.

Adding insult to injury, the report was published March 8, 2023, “in recognition” of International Women’s Day. Never mind the fact that young girls and women are the primary victims of this sick mindset.

The “manmade climate change” hysteria and subsequent war on carbon is another fabricated “emergency” that is unhinged from science and reality. And the UN’s SDGs are perfectly tailored to enable the endgame. Under these goals, human freedom, human health and quality of life are sacrificed to “protect the environment and save the planet.”

As Rose notes, if the WHO pandemic treaty goes through, we can expect to be locked down indefinitely under the guise of “some climate catastrophe, likely linked to some ‘deadly pathogen’ passed to humans via some insect vector like mosquitoes.”

By then, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) will also be in place, which will enable the unelected totalitarian regime to enforce whatever restrictions the WHO and its funders dream up, be it related to the food you’re allowed to eat based on your carbon footprint, the drugs you’re forced to take, what causes you’re allowed to fund, what businesses you’re allowed to buy from, when and how far you’re allowed to travel or anything else.

“A practical way I can think of to stop the endgame from being realized is to stop the CBDC,” Rose writes. “Use cash. Insist upon it. Do not give business to stores that only use cashless systems. Supply equals demand, so demand the use of CASH.”

Other Strategies to Reclaim Our Freedoms

Other ways to prevent the WHO’s power grab, include the following:

By Dr. Joseph Mercola (Mercola.com)

Sources and References

Disease X: Upcoming rockstar on world stage.

Are you getting bored of listening to the exact same song and dance numbers over and over again? Are the old “viral” bands just not doing it for you anymore? Are you looking for something new and mysterious to come along in order to spice things up a bit and reignite the dwindling levels of fear? If so, then you are in luck as there is a brand new “viral” sensation headed your way!

Introducing Disease X!

“An old adage says, “Prevention is better than cure.” Nothing exemplifies this idea better than “Disease X.” According to the World Health Organization (WHO), “Disease X represents the knowledge that a serious international epidemic could be caused by a pathogen currently unknown to cause human disease.”1

Richard Hatchett, chief executive officer (CEO) of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), said about Disease X, “It might sound like science fiction, but Disease X is something we must prepare for.”2 In a list of diseases that the WHO considers high priority in terms of research and development, Disease X occupies a spot among diseases such as Ebola, Zika, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).1Unexpected outbreaks of infectious disease (Disease X) have repeatedly rocked the medical confidence and have taken the medical world by surprise.3

Some experts have even commented that COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), met the standards to be considered the first Disease X,4 while some authors have called Zika a Disease X.5However, one unfortunate possibility is that COVID-19 and other recent pandemics might have been milder versions of what will eventually be the most prominent Disease X.

Disease X is supposed to be caused by a “pathogen X.” Such a pathogen is expected to be a zoonosis, most likely an RNA virus, emerging from an area where the right mix of risk factors highly promotes the risk for sustained transmission.6


The Hate Crime Purging of “Antisemites” Is Underway!

Saying anything about Israel’s misbehavior can send you to jail. There have recently been a number of incidents that would be of interest if one has concerns about the sorry state of free speech in Europe and the United States, the so-called “democracies” who tend to boast about their freedoms and the rights of their… Continue reading The Hate Crime Purging of “Antisemites” Is Underway!

The Profumo Affair: A Real-Life Case of Eyes Wide Shut

Cliveden House  We have one incident which is clear evidence of the type of activity happening amongst the elite, as portrayed in Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut, whose ritual sex scenes were filmed at Mentmore Towers, a nineteenth-century English country house built between 1852 and 1854 for the Rothschild family. That is the Profumo Affair, and… Continue reading The Profumo Affair: A Real-Life Case of Eyes Wide Shut

Hail Santa: The Occult Origins of Christmas

Zagmuk Christmas is an annual festival observed primarily on December 25 among billions of people worldwide. But there are two Christmas themes celebrated simultaneously. The purpose of Christmas is most popularly associated with the celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ. However, at the same time, that theme has become increasingly overtaken by the role… Continue reading Hail Santa: The Occult Origins of Christmas

The Jew in Court

As wire-pullers and mouthpieces of the criminal and political Underworld, Jewry leads a concentrated attack upon the law and order of the people. The Jewish fence helpfully stands by the Jewish thief, the Jewish psychologist and expert stands by the Jewish sexual offender, and the Jewish attorney stands by both; the judgement is not in… Continue reading The Jew in Court